首页> 外文期刊>American journal of rhinology & allergy >Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
【24h】

Standalone balloon dilation versus sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial

机译:独立球囊扩张术与鼻窦手术治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎:一项前瞻性,多中心,随机对照研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) to test the hypotheses that symptom improvement after balloon dilation was noninferior to functional endoscopic sinus COPY surgery (FESS) and balloon dilation was superior to FESS for postoperative debridements. Methods: Adults with uncomplicated CRS of the maxillary sinuses with or without anterior ethmoid disease who met criteria for medically necessary FESS were randomized 1:1 to office balloon dilation or FESS and followed for 6 months. A minimum of 36 patients per arm were required to test the hypotheses with 90% power. Symptom improvement using the validated 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20) survey, debridements, recovery outcomes, complications, and revision surgeries were compared between groups. Results: Ninety-two patients (50 balloon dilation; 42 FESS) were treated. Mean SNOT-20 improvement was 1.67 ± 1.10 and 1.60 ± 0.96 in the balloon and FESS arms, respectively. Both groups showed clinically meaningful and statistically significant (p < 0.0001) improvement and the balloon arm was noninferior (p < 0.001) to FESS. The mean number of postprocedure debridements per patient was 0.1 ± 0.6 in the balloon arm versus 1.2 ? 1.0 in the FESS arm, with the balloon group showing superiority (p < 0.0001). Occurrence of postoperative nasal bleeding (p = 0.011), duration of prescription pain medication use (p < 0.001), recovery time (p = 0.002), and short-term symptom improvement (p = 0.014) were all significantly better for balloon dilation versus FESS. No complications occurred in either group and one revision surgery was reported in each arm. Conclusion: Balloon dilation is noninferior to FESS for symptom improvement and superior to FESS for postoperative debridements in patients with maxillary and anterior ethmoid disease. Balloon dilation is an effective treatment in patients with uncomplicated CRS who meet the criteria for medically necessary FESS.
机译:背景:对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究,以检验以下假设:球囊扩张术后症状改善不逊于功能性内窥镜鼻窦COPY手术(FESS),而球囊扩张术对术后清创术优于FESS。方法:将符合医学上必要的FESS标准的上颌窦有或无前筛窦疾病的单纯CRS成年人按1:1比例随机分配至办公室球囊扩张术或FESS,然后随访6个月。每只手臂至少需要36名患者才能以90%的功效测试假设。使用经过验证的20项鼻中鼻息肉测试(SNOT-20)进行症状改善,比较两组患者的清创,恢复结果,并发症和翻修手术。结果:共治疗了92例患者(50例球囊扩张; 42例FESS)。气囊和FESS臂的平均SNOT-20改善分别为1.67±1.10和1.60±0.96。两组均显示出临床意义和统计学意义(p <0.0001)改善,并且气囊臂不低于FESS(p <0.001)。每个患者的平均术后球囊清创术次数为0.1±0.6,而平均为1.2?在FESS臂中为1.0,气球组显示出优势(p <0.0001)。与球囊扩张相比,术后鼻腔出血的发生率(p = 0.011),处方止痛药的使用时间(p <0.001),恢复时间(p = 0.002)和短期症状改善(p = 0.014)均明显好于费斯。两组均未发生并发症,每组报告了一次翻修手术。结论:球囊扩张术在上颌及前筛骨病患者中,在症状改善方面不逊于FESS,在术后清创术方面优于FESS。对于符合医学上必要的FESS标准的单纯性CRS患者,球囊扩张术是一种有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号