首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation >Estimated albumin excretion rate versus urine albumin-creatinine ratio for the assessment of albuminuria: A diagnostic test study from the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study
【24h】

Estimated albumin excretion rate versus urine albumin-creatinine ratio for the assessment of albuminuria: A diagnostic test study from the prevention of renal and vascular endstage disease (PREVEND) study

机译:估计白蛋白排泄率与尿白蛋白-肌酐比值评估白蛋白尿:一项从预防肾脏和血管末期疾病(PREVEND)的诊断试验研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) in spot urine samples is recommended for albuminuria screening instead of measured albumin excretion rate (mAER) in 24-hour urine collections. In patients with extremes of muscle mass, differences in spot urine creatinine values may lead to under- or overestimation of mAER by ACR. We hypothesized that calculating estimated AER (eAER) using spot ACR and estimated creatinine excretion rate (eCER) may improve albuminuria assessment. Study Design Diagnostic test study. Setting & Participants 2,711 community-living individuals from the general population of the Netherlands participating in the PREVEND (Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease) Study. Index Test eAER was computed as the product of ACR and eCER. eCER was computed using 3 previously validated methods (Ix, Ellam, and Walser). Reference Test mAER, based on two 24-hour urine collections. Accuracy of the eAER and ACR were defined as the percentage of participants falling within 30% (P 30) of mAER. Results Mean age was 49 years, 46% were men, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 84 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m 2, and median mAER was 7.2 (IQR, 5.4-11.0) mg/d. Mean measured CER was 1,381 mg/d, and median ACR was 4.9 mg/g. Using the Ix equation, median eAER was 6.4 mg/d. In the full cohort, eAER was more accurate and less biased compared to ACR (P30, 48.9% vs 33.6%; bias, -34.2% vs -14.1%, respectively). In subgroup analysis, improvement was most notable in the middle and highest weight tertiles and in men. Using the other methods for eCER produced similar results. Limitations Little ethnic heterogeneity and a generally healthy cohort make extension of findings to other races and the chronically ill uncertain. Conclusions In a large community-dwelling cohort, eAER was more accurate than ACR in assessing albuminuria.
机译:建议将现场尿液样本中的背景白蛋白-肌酐比值(ACR)用于蛋白尿筛查,而不是在24小时尿液收集中测量的白蛋白排泄率(mAER)。对于肌肉量极高的患者,尿肌酐现货值的差异可能会导致ACR对mAER的低估或高估。我们假设使用现场ACR和估计的肌酐排泄率(eCER)计算估计的AER(eAER)可以改善白蛋白尿评估。研究设计诊断测试研究。设置与参与者参加PREVEND(预防肾脏和血管末期疾病)研究的荷兰总人口中的2,711名社区居民。指数测试eAER计算为ACR和eCER的乘积。使用3种先前验证的方法(Ix,Ellam和Walser)计算eCER。基于两次24小时尿液收集的参考测试mAER。 eAER和ACR的准确度定义为落在mAER的30%(P 30)以内的参与者百分比。结果平均年龄为49岁,男性为46%,平均肾小球滤过率估计为84±15 mL / min / 1.73 m 2,中位数mAER为7.2(IQR,5.4-11.0)mg / d。平均测得的CER为1,381 mg / d,中位ACR为4.9 mg / g。使用Ix方程,中位eAER为6.4 mg / d。在整个队列中,与ACR相比,eAER更为准确且偏见更少(P30,48.9%比33.6%;偏倚,-34.2%比-14.1%)。在亚组分析中,中,最高体重的三分位数和男性的改善最为明显。使用其他方法进行eCER产生类似的结果。局限性少数种族异质性和总体健康的队列使研究结果扩展到其他种族和长期患病的不确定因素。结论在一个大型社区居民队列中,eAER在评估蛋白尿方面比ACR更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号