首页> 外文期刊>藥學雜誌 >Subject making and evaluation method for objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical practice
【24h】

Subject making and evaluation method for objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical practice

机译:物理结构化临床检查(欧安组织)在制药实践中的主题制定与评价方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to discuss subject selection and the evaluation method for an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in pharmaceutical sciences. We designed the OSCE to assess pharmaceutical students' clinical ability. In this trial, there are three stations (ST1 in circle: dispensing powdered medicine, ST2 in circle: patient reception, ST3 in circle: drug counseling), and 25 students and six instructors participated. Each student took an examination at two stations, and evaluated other students at the other station. Each instructor evaluated the student at two stations. Before the evaluation, we developed a checklist that contained the items "evaluation of the quantity" of the action, "evaluation of the quality" of the skill and the attitude, and overall evaluation OSCE trial, we calculated and analyzed each examinee's evaluation score. In ST1 in circle and ST3 in circle, the average time for performance exceeded the time limit (5 min). There was no significant relationship betweenthe each examinee's evaluation score and the time at all stations. The evaluation point "evaluation of the quantity" did not differ among evaluators, but a difference was seen in the "evaluation of the quality." In addition, in the quantitative evaluation, there was a difference in the evaluation of the item for which the evaluator's judgment was necessary. Instructors' evaluations were more severer than students'. In the "overall evaluation," there was no significant relation between the quantitative evaluation score and the score of the overall impression. However, there was a significant relationship with the qualitative evaluation. From these results, for assignment making, it is necessary for examinees to finish the work within the time limit, and that the evaluation not affect the performance time. Additionally, it is necessary to standardize the evaluation to reduce differences among evaluators, who should be trained. Moreover, it was suggested that the selection of an appropriate evaluation system foreach evaluation item is important in OSCE stations.
机译:本研究的目的是讨论药学科学中临床检查(欧安组织)的主题选择和评价方法。我们设计了欧安组织,以评估药学学生的临床能力。在这项试验中,有三个站(ST1圈:分配粉末药,ST2为圈子:患者接待,ST3为圈子:毒品咨询),以及25名学生和六位教练参加了25名教师。每个学生在两个站进行考试,并在其他站评估其他学生。每个教练在两个站评估学生。在评估之前,我们开发了一份清单,其中包含了行动的“评估”的项目,“评估了技能的质量”以及整体评估欧安组织试验,我们计算并分析了每个考生的评估得分。在圆圈和ST3的ST1中,性能的平均时间超过时间限制(5分钟)。每个考生的评估得分和所有站点的时间都没有重要的关系。评估点“评估数量”在评估员之间没有差异,但在“质量评估”中看到了差异。此外,在定量评估中,评估评估员判决是必要的项目的评价存在差异。教师的评估比学生更严厉。在“整体评估”中,定量评估得分与整体印象的得分之间没有重大关系。但是,与定性评估有重要关系。从这些结果中,对于分配制作,考生是必要的,以完成时间限制内的工作,并且评估不会影响性能时间。此外,有必要规范评估,以减少应培训的评估员之间的差异。此外,有人建议选择适当的评估系统的评估项目在欧安组织中很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号