...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of psychiatry >Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
【24h】

Psychodynamic therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy in social anxiety disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机译:社会焦虑症的心理动力疗法和认知行为疗法:一项多中心随机对照试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE Various approaches to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) have been shown to be effective for social anxiety disorder. For psychodynamic therapy, evidence for efficacy in this disorder is scant. The authors tested the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy and CBT in social anxiety disorder in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. METHOD In an outpatient setting, 495 patients with social anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to manual-guided CBT (N=209), manual-guided psychodynamic therapy (N=207), or a waiting list condition (N=79). Assessments were made at baseline and at end of treatment. Primary outcome measures were rates of remission and response, based on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale applied by raters blind to group assignment. Several secondary measures were assessed as well. RESULTS Remission rates in the CBT, psychodynamic therapy, and waiting list groups were 36%, 26%, and 9%, respectively. Response rates were 60%, 52%, and 15%, respectively. CBT and psychodynamic therapy were significantly superior to waiting list for both remission and response. CBT was significantly superior to psychodynamic therapy for remission but not for response. Between-group effect sizes for remission and response were small. Secondary outcome measures showed significant differences in favor of CBT for measures of social phobia and interpersonal problems, but not for depression. CONCLUSIONS CBT and psychodynamic therapy were both efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder, but there were significant differences in favor of CBT. For CBT, the response rate was comparable to rates reported in Swedish and German studies in recent years. For psychodynamic therapy, the response rate was comparable to rates reported for pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral group therapy.
机译:目的认知行为治疗(CBT)的各种方法已被证明对社交焦虑症有效。对于心理动力疗法,该疾病疗效的证据很少。作者在一项多中心随机对照试验中测试了心理动力疗法和CBT在社交焦虑症中的疗效。方法在门诊患者中,将495例社交焦虑症患者随机分配至手动引导CBT(N = 209),手动引导心理动力疗法(N = 207)或等待名单条件(N = 79)。在基线和治疗结束时进行评估。主要结局指标是缓解和缓解率,这是根据对小组分配不知情的评估者使用的利勃维茨社交焦虑量表进行的。还评估了一些次要措施。结果CBT,心理动力疗法和等待名单组的缓解率分别为36%,26%和9%。回应率分别为60%,52%和15%。 CBT和心理动力疗法在缓解和反应方面均明显优于等待清单。在缓解方面,CBT明显优于心理动力疗法,但对于缓解而言却不是。缓解和反应的组间效应大小很小。次要结果指标显示在社交恐惧症和人际交往问题的指标上,对CBT的支持存在显着差异,而对于抑郁症则没有。结论CBT和心理动力疗法在治疗社交焦虑症方面均有效,但对CBT的支持存在显着差异。对于CBT,回应率与近年来瑞典和德国研究报告的比率相当。对于心理动力疗法,反应率与药物治疗和认知行为小组疗法的报道率相当。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号