首页> 外文期刊>American journal of physics >A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms
【24h】

A direct comparison of conceptual learning and problem solving ability in traditional and studio style classrooms

机译:在传统教室和工作室教室中直接比较概念学习和解决问题的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present data on student performance on conceptual understanding and on quantitative problem-solving ability in introductory mechanics in both studio and traditional classroom modes. The conceptual measures used were the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation. Quantitative problem-solving ability was measured with standard questions on the final exam. Our data compare three different quarters over the course of 2 years. In all three quarters, the normalized learning gain in conceptual understanding was significantly larger for students in the studio sections. At the same time, students in the studio sections performed the same or slightly worse on quantitative final exam problems. (c) 2005 American Association of Physics Teachers.
机译:我们提供有关学生表现的数据,包括在工作室和传统课堂模式下的概念性理解和入门力学中的定量问题解决能力。使用的概念度量包括“力概念清单”和“力和运动概念评估”。定量解决问题的能力是在期末考试中使用标准问题来衡量的。我们的数据比较了2年中的三个不同季度。在所有三个季度中,工作室部分的学生在概念理解上的标准化学习收益大大增加。同时,工作室部分的学生在定量期末考试问题上的表现相同或稍差。 (c)2005年美国物理教师协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号