首页> 外文期刊>Allergy >Efficacy of grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy for three consecutive seasons and after cessation of treatment: the ECRIT study.
【24h】

Efficacy of grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy for three consecutive seasons and after cessation of treatment: the ECRIT study.

机译:草花粉舌下免疫疗法连续三个季节以及治疗停止后的功效:ECRIT研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Data supporting a carry-over effect with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are scarce. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy, carry-over effect and safety of grass pollen SLIT using co-seasonal treatment. METHODS: Patients (7.9-64.7 years) with grass pollen allergy received ultra-rush titration with increasing doses (30, 90, 150 and 300 IR) of a 5-grass pollen mixture every 20 min at the start of the pollen seasons, followed by 300 IR daily until the end of the pollen seasons. A baseline season (no SLIT) was followed by three consecutive treatment seasons and one follow-up season. Symptoms, medication and adverse events were documented and specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E and IgG(4) measured. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 183 of the 213 randomized patients. Mean treatment duration varied between seasons (81.8-92.7 days). Combined scores (symptoms and medication) improved progressively across treatment seasons (up to 44.7% improvement for SLIT compared with baseline) and fluctuated between -11.3% and -14.8% for placebo (P < 0.05). Similar changes were observed for symptom scores, with a successive decrease of 39.7% (SLIT) and fluctuations between +13.6% and -1.51% for placebo (P < 0.05). Combined score (P = 0.0508) and symptom score improvements (P = 0.0144) with SLIT continued during follow up. Increases in specific IgG(4) observed in the first season were sustained for SLIT vs placebo throughout treatment (P = 0.0001). Titration and daily SLIT were well tolerated. No serious systemic or anaphylactic reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Seasonal SLIT with ultra-rush titration is well tolerated and effective from the first treatment season onwards. These data indicate a carry-over effect of seasonal SLIT.
机译:背景:缺乏支持舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)残留效应的数据。这项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究评估了使用季节性治疗的草粉SLIT的功效,残留效应和安全性。方法:对花粉过敏的患者(7.9-64.7岁)在花粉季节开始时每20分钟接受一次超急速滴定,并逐渐增加剂量(30、90、150和300 IR)的5草粉混合物。每天300 IR,直到花粉季节结束。在基线季节(无SLIT)之后是连续三个治疗季节和一个随访季节。记录症状,用药和不良事件,并测量特异性免疫球蛋白(Ig)E和IgG(4)。结果:对213例随机分组患者中的183例进行了数据分析。平均治疗持续时间因季节而异(81.8-92.7天)。在整个治疗季节中,综合评分(症状和用药)逐渐改善(与基线相比,SLIT改善高达44.7%),安慰剂在-11.3%至-14.8%之间波动(P <0.05)。症状评分观察到类似变化,安慰剂连续下降39.7%(SLIT),波动幅度在+ 13.6%和-1.51%之间(P <0.05)。随访期间,SLIT的综合评分(P = 0.0508)和症状评分改善(P = 0.0144)。在整个治疗过程中,SLIT与安慰剂相比,在第一季中观察到的特异性IgG(4)的增加得以维持(P = 0.0001)。滴定和每日SLIT耐受性良好。没有严重的全身或过敏反应的报道。结论:从第一个治疗季节开始,具有超急诊滴定的季节性SLIT耐受性良好且有效。这些数据表明季节性SLIT的结转效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号