首页> 外文期刊>American journal of psychiatry >DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part III: Development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5
【24h】

DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part III: Development and reliability testing of a cross-cutting symptom assessment for DSM-5

机译:在美国和加拿大的DSM-5现场试验,第三部分:DSM-5跨领域症状评估的开发和可靠性测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: The authors sought to document, in adult and pediatric patient populations, the development, descriptive statistics, and test-retest reliability of cross-cutting symptom measures proposed for inclusion in DSM-5. Method: Data were collected as part of the multisite DSM-5 Field Trials in large academic settings. There were seven sites focusing on adult patients and four sites focusing on child and adolescent patients. Cross-cutting symptom measures were self-completed by the patient or an informant before the test and the retest interviews, which were conducted from 4 hours to 2 weeks apart. Clinician-report measures were completed during or after the clinical diagnostic interviews. Informants included adult patients, child patients age 11 and older, parents of all child patients age 6 and older, and legal guardians for adult patients unable to self-complete the measures. Study patients were sampled in a stratified design, and sampling weights were used in data analyses. The mean scores and standard deviations were computed and pooled across adult and child sites. Reliabilities were reported as pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: In adults, test-retest reliabilities of the cross-cutting symptom items generally were good to excellent. At the child and adolescent sites, parents were also reliable reporters of their children's symptoms, with few exceptions. Reliabilities were not as uniformly good for child respondents, and ICCs for several items fell into the questionable range in this age group. Clinicians rated psychosis with good reliability in adult patients but were less reliable in assessing clinical domains related to psychosis in children and to suicide in all age groups. Conclusions: These results show promising test-retest reliability results for this group of assessments, many of which are newly developed or have not been previously tested in psychiatric populations.
机译:目的:作者试图在成人和儿科患者人群中记录拟纳入DSM-5的横断面症状措施的发展,描述性统计数据和重测信度。方法:在大型学术环境中,将数据收集为多站点DSM-5现场试验的一部分。有七个针对成人患者的场所,四个针对儿童和青少年患者的场所。在进行测试和复验访谈之前,患者或告密者会自行完成交叉症状的测量,这些访谈间隔为4小时至2周。临床医生报告措施是在临床诊断访谈期间或之后完成的。举报人包括成年患者,11岁及以上的儿童患者,所有6岁及以上的儿童患者的父母以及无法自行完成措施的成年患者的法定监护人。对研究患者进行分层设计抽样,并将抽样权重用于数据分析。计算了成人和儿童站点的平均得分和标准差,并将其汇总。可靠性报告为具有95%置信区间的合并组内相关系数(ICC)。结果:在成年人中,横断面症状项的重测信度一般都很好。在儿童和青少年场所,父母几乎都是孩子症状的可靠报告者,几乎没有例外。可靠性对于儿童受访者而言并非一贯那么好,在这个年龄段中,几项的ICC属于可疑范围。临床医生对成人患者的精神病评价为良好,但在评估与儿童精神病和各个年龄段的自杀有关的临床领域时,可靠性较差。结论:这些结果表明该组评估有希望的重测信度结果,其中许多是新开发的或以前未在精神病学人群中进行过测试。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号