...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of psychiatry >Combined treatments for depression as for other medical disorders.
【24h】

Combined treatments for depression as for other medical disorders.

机译:抑郁症的其他综合治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To the Editor: We read with great interest the article by Dr. Rush et al. on the Combining Medications to Enhance Depression Outcomes (CO-MED) study (1) and the editorial by Dr. Coryell (2) in the July 2011 issue of the Journal. The overall result of this large-scale trial is that a single antidepressant produced the same remission results as did combinations started 1 week after treatment initiation. Our main issue with CO-MED, apart from its not being a double-blind study, is the dosing of the antidepressants. The CO-MED study did not adhere to an important rule of combination treatment in medicine: use similar and/ or effective dosages of both agents. For instance, when treating asthma, physicians should administer standard doses of both a beta_2-adrenergic agonist and an inhaled steroid, not lower doses. Physicians were aware of the dosages used throughout the study, and despite the use of a decision tree involving tolerability and response for titration, the dose of escitalopram was near the maximum in the monotherapy arm and was significantly lower when combined with bupro-pion. Consequendy, the dosage issue has not been "credibly dismissed" in the CO-MED study (2).
机译:致编辑:我们非常感兴趣地阅读了Rush等人的文章。关于联合用药以提高抑郁症结局的研究(CO-MED)研究(1)和Coryell博士(2)在2011年7月发行的《期刊》上的社论。这项大规模试验的总体结果是,与治疗开始后1周开始的联合用药相比,单一抗抑郁药的缓解效果相同。除了不是双盲研究之外,CO-MED的主要问题是抗抑郁药的剂量。 CO-MED研究未遵循医学上联合治疗的重要规则:使用相似和/或有效剂量的两种药物。例如,在治疗哮喘时,医生应同时服用标准剂量的β_2-肾上腺素能激动剂和吸入类固醇,而不是低剂量。医师知道整个研究中使用的剂量,尽管使用了涉及耐受性和滴定反应的决策树,依他普仑的剂量在单药治疗组中接近最大,与安非他酮联合使用时明显降低。因此,在CO-MED研究中并未“可靠地消除”剂量问题(2)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号