...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >The 200-m fast-walk test compared with the 6-min walk test and the maximal cardiopulmonary test: a pilot study.
【24h】

The 200-m fast-walk test compared with the 6-min walk test and the maximal cardiopulmonary test: a pilot study.

机译:200分钟快速步行测试与6分钟步行测试和最大心肺测试相比:一项试点研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The 200-m fast-walk test has been proposed as a high- intensity performance test in healthy, elderly subjects. Adaptation of low-risk coronary artery disease patients during this test were compared with those in a 6-min walk test and a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. DESIGN: Thirty patients with stable coronary artery disease (51.9 +/- 8.7 yrs), referred to the cardiac rehabilitation department, performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test, then a 200-m fast-walk test and a 6-min walk test in a random order, before and after the training period (6 wks, 3 days per week). Heart rate was monitored during each test. Peak workload of cardiopulmonary exercise test, distance walked on the 6-min walk test, and time to perform the 200-m fast-walk test were measured. A subsample of ten patients performed the exercise test with gas exchange measurements, with ventilatory threshold determination. RESULTS: All subjects completed walk tests without complaint or incidents. Compared with the cardiopulmonary exercise test, the cardiac relative intensity was higher during the 200-m fast-walk test than during the 6-min walk test, both before (89.6% vs. 78.1% of cardiopulmonary exercise test maximal heart rate; P < 0.05) and after (83.8% vs. 74.3%; P < 0.05) training. Among the subsample of ten patients, the 200-m fast-walk test heart rate was significantly higher than the ventilatory threshold heart rate, which did not differ from the 6-min walk test heart rate. The 200-m fast-walk test time significantly decreased after training (-9.1%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients with coronary artery disease at low risk, the 200-m fast-walk test explores higher levels of cardiorespiratory capacity than the 6-min walk test. Thus, this could be a useful field test in complement to the cardiopulmonary exercise test to assess functional capacity improvement and update training targets regularly during the course of high-intensity rehabilitation programs in this population.
机译:目的:200 m快速行走测试已被提议作为健康老年人的高强度性能测试。在此测试中,将低风险冠状动脉疾病患者的适应性与6分钟步行测试和最大心肺运动测试中的适应性进行了比较。设计:30名患有稳定冠状动脉疾病(51.9 +/- 8.7岁)的患者被转诊至心脏康复科,进行了心肺运动测试,然后随机进行了200 m的快速行走测试和6分钟的行走测试在训练期间(每周6天,每周3天)之前和之后订购。在每次测试中都要监测心率。测量心肺运动测试的峰值工作量,6分钟步行测试的步行距离以及执行200 m快速步行测试的时间。十名患者的子样本通过气体交换测量进行了运动测试,并确定了通气阈值。结果:所有受试者均完成步行测试,没有抱怨或事件。与心肺运动试验相比,200 m快速行走试验期间的心脏相对强度高于6 min行走试验期间的心脏相对强度(心肺运动试验最大心率分别为89.6%和78.1%; P < 0.05)和训练后(83.8%vs. 74.3%; P <0.05)。在十名患者的子样本中,200 m快速行走测试心率显着高于通气阈值心率,这与6分钟行走测试心率无差异。训练后200 m快速行走测试时间显着减少(-9.1%,P <0.01)。结论:在低风险的冠心病患者中,与6分钟步行测试相比,200 m快速步行测试可探寻更高水平的心肺功能。因此,这可以作为对心肺运动测试的补充的有用的现场测试,以评估该人群的高强度康复计划过程中功能能力的改善并定期更新训练目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号