...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >The immediate effectiveness of electrical nerve stimulation and electrical muscle stimulation on myofascial trigger points.
【24h】

The immediate effectiveness of electrical nerve stimulation and electrical muscle stimulation on myofascial trigger points.

机译:电神经刺激和肌电刺激对肌筋膜触发点的即时效果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study is designed to investigate the immediate effectiveness of electrotherapy on myofascial trigger points of upper trapezius muscle. Sixty patients (25 males and 35 females) who had myofascial trigger points in one side of the upper trapezius muscles were studied. The involved upper trapezius muscles were treated with three different methods according to a random assignment: group A muscles (n = 18) were given placebo treatment (control group); group B muscles (n = 20) were treated with electrical nerve stimulation (ENS) therapy; and group C muscles (n = 22) were given electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) therapy. The effectiveness of treatment was assessed by conducting three measurements on each muscle before and immediately after treatment: subjective pain intensity [(PI) with a visual analog scale], pressure pain threshold [(PT) with algometry], and range of motion [(ROM) with a goniometer] of upper trapezius muscle (lateral bending of cervical spine to the opposite side). When the effectiveness of treatment was compared with that of the placebo group (group A), there was significant improvement in PI and PT in group B (P < 0.01) but not in group C (P > 0.05). The improvement of ROM was significantly more in group C (P < 0.01) as compared with that in group A or group B. When each group was divided into two additional subgroups based on the initial PI, it was found that ENS could reduce PI and increase PT significantly (P < 0.05), but did not significantly (P > 0.05) improve ROM, as compared with the placebo group for both subgroups. EMS could significantly (P < 0.05) improve ROM, but not PT, better than the placebo groups, for either subgroup. It could reduce PI significantly more (P < 0.05) than placebo controls only for the subgroup with mild to moderate pain, but not with severe pain. For pain relief, ENS was significantly better (P < 0.05) than EMS; but for the improvement of ROM, EMS was significantly better (P < 0.05) than ENS. It is concluded that ENS is more effective for immediate relief of myofascial trigger point pain than EMS, and EMS has a better effect on immediate release of muscle tightness than ENS.
机译:这项研究旨在调查电疗法对上斜方肌肌筋膜触发点的即时有效性。研究了六十例患者(男性25例,女性35例),其斜方肌上部肌肉一侧有肌筋膜触发点。根据随机分配,用三种不同的方法治疗受累的上斜方肌:A组肌肉(n = 18)接受安慰剂治疗(对照组); B组肌肉(n = 20)接受了神经电刺激治疗。对C组肌肉(n = 22)进行了电刺激(EMS)治疗。通过在治疗前后分别对每块肌肉进行三项测量来评估治疗的有效性:主观疼痛强度[(使用视觉模拟量表的(PI)),压力疼痛阈值[(algometry)(PT)和运动范围[( ROM),并使用测角计]上斜方肌(颈椎向另一侧弯曲)。将治疗效果与安慰剂组(A组)进行比较,B组的PI和PT有显着改善(P <0.01),而C组则没有(P> 0.05)。与A组或B组相比,C组的ROM改善明显更多(P <0.01)。当根据初始PI将每组分为两个额外的亚组时,发现ENS可以降低PI和与安慰剂组相比,两个亚组的PT均显着提高PT(P <0.05),但不显着(P> 0.05)改善ROM。对于任一亚组,EMS均可显着(P <0.05)改善ROM,但不能改善PT,优于安慰剂组。仅对于轻度至中度疼痛的亚组,它可以比安慰剂对照组显着降低PI(P <0.05),而对于重度疼痛则不能。为了缓解疼痛,ENS比EMS更好(P <0.05);但是对于ROM的改善,EMS显着优于ENS(P <0.05)。结论是,与EMS相比,ENS可以更有效地缓解肌筋膜触发点疼痛,而EMS可以使ENS的紧实度更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号