...
首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to laboratory animals: ATLA >Do faculty in southern Indian Medical Colleges support animal use in postgraduate education more than in undergraduate education?
【24h】

Do faculty in southern Indian Medical Colleges support animal use in postgraduate education more than in undergraduate education?

机译:印度南部医学院的教职员工是否比本科教育更支持动物使用?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In India, animal experiments play an integral role in both undergraduate medical education (UGME) and postgraduate medical education (PGME) in the discipline of Pharmacology. Therefore, we aimed to compare the perceptions of pharmacology faculty members in southern India with regard to the use of animal experiments and alternatives in UGME and in PGME. We also determined the association between these perceptions and the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. Pharmacology faculty members in 15 medical colleges located in southern India answered a 27-statement, 5-domain questionnaire with a total score of 108. The means of the total, domain and statement scores were analysed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The mean total score obtained for faculty members (n = 52) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for PGME (61.2/108) than that for UGME (51.9/108). Significant differences were observed in the mean total and in the domain scores for PGME when compared to UGME in all of the socio-demographic groups, except for male faculty members and those without an MD or doctoral degree. The mean individual statement scores also indicated that there is more support for animal use in PGME. Overall, it was apparent that pharmacology faculty members in southern Indian medical colleges support animal use in PGME more than in UGME. Increased awareness is required among faculty members concerning alternatives to animal experiments in medical education, especially in PGME.
机译:在印度,动物实验在药理学领域的本科医学教育(UGME)和研究生医学教育(PGME)中均扮演着不可或缺的角色。因此,我们旨在比较印度南部药理学教职员工对UGME和PGME中动物实验和替代品的使用的看法。我们还确定了这些看法与参与者的社会人口学特征之间的关联。位于印度南部的15所医学院的药理学教职员工回答了一份27项陈述的5域问卷,总分为108分。通过Wilcoxon秩和检验分析了总分,域和陈述得分的平均值。 PGME(61.2 / 108)的教职员工(n = 52)的平均总得分(UG)(51.9 / 108)显着更高(p <0.001)。与UGME相比,在所有的社会人口学组中,除男性教职人员以及没有医学博士学位或博士学位的人之外,PGME的平均总分和领域得分均存在显着差异。平均个人陈述得分还表明,PGME对动物使用有更多支持。总体而言,很明显,印度南部医学院的药理学教职员工比UGME支持PGME中的动物使用。在医学教育中,尤其是在PGME中,需要提高教师对动物实验替代方法的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号