首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Preventive Medicine >Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases
【24h】

Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases

机译:超市食品采购的社会经济地位,能源成本和营养成分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The relative affordability of energy-dense versus nutrient-rich foods may promote socioeconomic disparities in dietary quality and obesity. Although supermarkets are the largest food source in the American diet, the associations between SES and the cost and nutrient content of freely chosen food purchases have not been described. Purpose: To investigate relationships of SES with the energy cost ($/1000 kcal) and nutrient content of freely chosen supermarket purchases. Methods: Supermarket shoppers (n=69) were recruited at a Phoenix AZ supermarket in 2009. The energy cost and nutrient content of participants' purchases were calculated from photographs of food packaging and nutrition labels using dietary analysis software. Data were analyzed in 2010-2011. Results: Two SES indicators, education and household income as a percentage of the federal poverty guideline (FPG), were associated with the energy cost of purchased foods. Adjusting for covariates, the amount spent on 1000 kcal of food was $0.26 greater for every multiple of the FPG, and those with a baccalaureate or postbaccalaureate degree spent an additional $1.05 for every 1000 kcal of food compared to those with no college education. Lower energy cost was associated with higher total fat and less protein, dietary fiber, and vegetables per 1000 kcal purchased. Conclusions: Low-SES supermarket shoppers purchase calories in inexpensive forms that are higher in fat and less nutrient-rich.
机译:背景:高能量食品与营养丰富的食品的相对负担能力可能会加剧饮食质量和肥胖症的社会经济差异。尽管超级市场是美国饮食中最大的食物来源,但尚未描述SES与自由选择的食物购买的成本和营养成分之间的关​​联。目的:研究SES与自由选择的超市购买的能源成本($ / 1000 kcal)和营养成分之间的关​​系。方法:2009年,在亚利桑那州凤凰城的一家超级市场招募了超市购物者(n = 69)。使用饮食分析软件根据食品包装和营养标签的照片计算参与者购买的能源成本和营养成分。分析了2010-2011年的数据。结果:两个SES指标,即教育和家庭收入占联邦贫困线(FPG)的百分比,与所购买食品的能源成本相关。调整协变量后,FPG的每一倍花费在1000 kcal的食物上的支出为$ 0.26,与那些没有大学学历的人相比,拥有学士学位或学士学位的人每花费1000 kcal的食物要多花$ 1.05。能源成本的降低与总脂肪的增加,蛋白质,膳食纤维和蔬菜的减少(每千大卡)有关。结论:低社会经济地位的超市购物者以廉价的形式购买卡路里,这些脂肪脂肪含量较高而营养成分较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号