...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation >Trauma patients meeting both Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's definitions for ventilator-associated pneumonia had worse outcomes than those meeting only one
【24h】

Trauma patients meeting both Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's definitions for ventilator-associated pneumonia had worse outcomes than those meeting only one

机译:患有疾病控制和预防呼吸机相关的肺炎的定义的创伤患者具有比仅举一点的令人难度的结果更糟糕的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) replaced its old definition for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with the ventilator-associated events algorithm in 2013. We sought to compare the outcome of trauma patients meeting the definitions for VAP in the two modules. Methods Trauma patients with blunt or penetrating injuries and with at least 2?d of ventilator support were identified from the trauma registry from 2013 to 2014. VAP was determined using two methods: (1) VAP as defined by the “old,” clinically based NHSN definition and (2) possible VAP as defined by the updated “new” NHSN definition. Cohen's kappa statistic was determined to compare the two definitions for VAP. To compare demographic and clinical outcomes, the chi-square and Student's t -tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results From 2013 to 2014, there were 1165 trauma patients admitted who had at least 2?d of ventilator support. Seventy-eight patients (6.6%) met the “new” NHSN definition for possible VAP, 361 patients (30.9%) met the “old” definition of VAP, and 68 patients (5.8%) met both definitions. The kappa statistic between VAP as defined by the “new” and “old” definitions was 0.22 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.27). There were no differences in age, gender, race, or injury severity score when comparing patients who met the different definitions. Those satisfying both definitions had longer ventilator support days ( P ?=?0.0009), intensive care unit length of stay (LOS; P ?=?0.0003), and hospital LOS ( P ?=?0.0344) when compared with those meeting only one definition. There was no difference in mortality for those meeting both and those meeting the old definition for VAP; patients meeting both definitions had higher respiratory rate at arrival ( P ?=?0.0178). Conclusions There was no difference in mortality between patients meeting the “old” and “new” NHSN definitions for VAP; those who met “both” definitions had longer ventilator support days, intensive care unit, and hospital LOS.
机译:摘要背景疾病控制和预防的国家医疗保健安全网(NHSN)的中心用呼吸机相关的肺炎(VAP)替代了2013年通风机相关的事件算法的旧定义。我们试图比较符合定义的创伤患者的结果对于两个模块中的VAP。方法从2013年到2014年,从创伤库中鉴定出钝或渗透损伤和至少2°D呼吸机呼吸障碍的创伤患者。使用两种方法测定VAP:(1)由“旧”,临床上定义的VAP NHSN定义和(2)由更新的“新”NHSN定义定义的可能的VAP。 COHEN的Kappa统计定决定比较VAP的两个定义。为了比较人口和临床结果,Chi-Square和学生的T -Test分别用于分类和连续变量。结果2013年至2014年,有1165名创伤患者承认至少有2个呼吸机支撑。七十八名患者(6.6%)达到了可能的VAP的“新”NHSN定义,361名患者(30.9%)达到了“旧”的VAP定义,68名患者(5.8%)均达到两个定义。由“新”和“旧”定义定义的VAP之间的κ统计为0.22(95%置信区间,0.17-0.27)。在比较符合不同定义的患者时,年龄,性别,种族或伤害严重程度得分没有差异。满足两个定义的人具有较长的呼吸机支撑天(p?= 0.0009),重症监护单位逗留时间(LOS; P?= 0.0003),与那些只有一个会议的人(P?= 0.0344)定义。对于那些会议的死亡率没有差异,以及遇到VAP的旧定义的人;遇到这两个定义的患者在抵达时具有更高的呼吸率(P?= 0.0178)。结论患者遇到“旧”和“新”NHSN定义的患者之间的死亡率没有差异;那些遇到“两个”定义的人有较长的呼吸机支撑天,重症监护病房和医院洛杉矶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号