...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Ultrasound, computed tomography, or the combination for the detection of supraclavicular lymph nodes in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a comparative study.
【24h】

Ultrasound, computed tomography, or the combination for the detection of supraclavicular lymph nodes in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a comparative study.

机译:超声波,计算断层扫描或用于检测食管或胃癌癌症患者的Supraclavicular淋巴结的组合:比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Both ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) can be used to detect supraclavicular lymph node metastases. Aim was to compare US, US plus fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA), CT, US + CT, and US-FNA + CT for the detection of these metastases in esophageal or gastric cardia cancer patients. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2004, 567 patients underwent US and CT for esophageal or gastric cardia cancer staging. Gold standard was postoperative detection of lymph nodes in the resected specimen, FNA, or a radiological result with follow-up. RESULTS: Sensitivities of US (75%), US-FNA (72%), US + CT (80%), and US-FNA + CT (79%) were higher than sensitivity of CT alone (25%) (P < 0.001). Specificities were high for US-FNA (100%), CT (99%), and US-FNA + CT (99%), whereas those of US alone (91%) and US + CT (91%) were lower (P < 0.001). In 4/65 (6%) patients with true-positive malignant lymph nodes, CT was positive with US and/or US-FNA being negative. However, in 36/65 (55%) patients, US and/or US-FNA were positive with CT being negative. CONCLUSION: US-FNA seems the preferred diagnostic modality for the detection of supraclavicular lymph node metastases in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Sensitivity of metastases detection only slightly improves if US-FNA is combined with CT. A prospective, comparative study is however needed.
机译:背景和目标:超声(US)和计算机断层扫描(CT)都可用于检测Supraclavicular淋巴结转移。目的是将美国,美国加上精细针痉挛(US-FNA),CT,US + CT和US-FNA + CT进行比较,用于检测食管或胃癌癌症患者的这些转移。方法:1994年至2004年间,567名患者接受了美国和CT的食管或胃癌癌症分期。黄金标准是术后检测切除的样品,FNA或随访的放射性导致淋巴结。结果:US(75%),US-FNA(72%),US + CT(80%)和US-FNA + CT(79%)的敏感性高于单独CT的敏感性(25%)(P < 0.001)。 US-FNA(100%),CT(99%)和US-FNA + CT(99%)的特异性高,而我们单独的(91%)和US + CT(91%)较低(P <0.001)。在4/65(6%)患有真正阳性恶性淋巴结的患者中,CT与我们和/或US-FNA为阴性。然而,在36/65(55%)患者中,US和/或US-FNA呈阳性,CT为阴性。结论:US-FNA似乎是食管或胃癌癌患者中患者的肝硬化淋巴结转移的优选诊断方式。转移检测的敏感性如果US-FNA与CT结合,则仅略微改善。然而,需要预期的比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号