...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Potential survival benefit of radiofrequency ablation for small solitary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in nonsurgically managed patients: A population-based analysis
【24h】

Potential survival benefit of radiofrequency ablation for small solitary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in nonsurgically managed patients: A population-based analysis

机译:非孤立症患者小孤病症肝内胆管癌的射频消融潜在存活率:基于人群的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background Little data regarding the selection of nonsurgical therapies for localized intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are available. Methods A cohort of nonsurgically managed patients with American Joint Commission on Cancer clinical stage I/II ICC in the United States from 2004 to 2013 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Overall survival (OS) was compared according to treatment options (radiofrequency ablation [RFA] vs chemoradiotherapy) using propensity-score matching. Results Among 505 patients, 86 patients were treated with RFA and 419 patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy. After propensity matching (n = 84, each group), 5-year OS was 17.6% among patients who underwent RFA vs 3.8% among patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (P < .001). On bivariate analysis, RFA was related to an OS benefit (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.66; P < .001). Specifially, a stage-specific subgroup analysis revealed a survival benefit in favor of RFA among stage I patients (5-year OS; RFA: 20.1% vs chemoradiotherapy: 3.7%, P < .001), whereas no difference in OS was noted among patients with stage II disease. Conclusion Among ICC patients with small (<= 5 cm), solitary ICC without vascular invasion, RFA was associated with better survival compared with chemoradiotherapy.
机译:背景技术有关局部肝内胆管癌(ICC)的非诊断疗法的选择的几乎没有数据。方法在国家癌症数据库中确定了美国2004年至2013年美国癌症临床阶段I / II I / II / IICC癌症临床审核I / II ICC的非专业委员会队伍队列。使用倾向分数匹配,根据治疗方案(射频消融[RFA] vs ChemorAdiotapationsys进行比较整体存活(OS)。结果505名患者中,86名患者用RFA治疗,419名患者进行了化学疗法。在倾向匹配(N = 84,每组)后,5年的OS是接受摄影疗法患者的RFA与3.8%的患者的17.6%(P <.001)。关于双变量分析,RFA与OS益处有关(危险比,0.46; 95%置信区间,0.33-0.66; P <.001)。规定,阶段特异性亚组分析显示出在I期患者中RFA的生存效益(5年的OS; RFA:20.1%VS ChemorAdiotapy:3.7%,P <.001),而OS中没有差异患者II阶段疾病。结论ICC小(<= 5cm)的患者,孤立性ICC没有血管侵袭,RFA与化学疗法相比,RFA与更好的存活相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号