...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Surgical Oncology >Preoperative clinicopathological characteristics of patients with solitary encapsulated follicular variants of papillary thyroid carcinomas
【24h】

Preoperative clinicopathological characteristics of patients with solitary encapsulated follicular variants of papillary thyroid carcinomas

机译:乳头状甲状腺癌患者术前临床病理特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Objectives Clinical outcomes in patients with the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) tend to vary according to the pathological subtypes. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics including preoperative radiological and cytopathological diagnoses in patients with solitary encapsulated FVPTCs (EFVPTCs) to prove the preoperative assessment dilemma. Methods Patients with solitary FVPTCs who underwent thyroid surgery were included. Results Of 271 patients, 194 patients (72%) had EFVPTCs, whereas 77 patients (28%) had infiltrative FVPTCs (IFVPTCs). EFVPTCs had larger tumor sizes ( P? ?0.001) and lower frequencies of extrathyroidal extension ( P? ?0.001) and cervical lymph node (LN) metastasis ( P? ?0.001) than IFVPTCs. There were significant differences in ultrasonography (US) findings, preoperative cytopathological diagnosis, and the prevalence of BRAF mutations between EFVPTCs and IFVPTCs. Invasive EFVPTCs were diagnosed in 89 patients (33%) and non‐invasive EFVPTCs in 105 patients (39%). Non‐invasive subtype had smaller tumor sizes ( P ?=?0.001) and lower frequencies of vascular invasion ( P? =?0.04) and cervical LN metastasis ( P ?=?0.02). There were no significant differences in preoperative US findings and cytopathological diagnoses between invasive and non‐invasive EFVPTCs. Conclusions Clinicopathological characteristics of EFVPTCs, including preoperative US findings, are different from those of IFVPTCs. However, preoperative radiological and cytopathological findings could not distinguish non‐invasive and invasive EFVPTCs.
机译:背景和目标乳头状甲状腺癌(FVPTC)卵泡变体患者的临床结果往往根据病理亚型而变化。我们的目标是评估临床病理学特征,包括术前放射和缩细胞病理学诊断的孤立包封的FVPTCS(EFVPTCS)的患者,以证明术前评估困境。方法包括孤立甲状腺手术的孤立性FVPTC的患者。结果271名患者,194名患者(72%)有EFVPTCS,而77名患者(28%)患有渗透性的FVPTCS(IFVPTC)。 EFVPTCs具有较大的肿瘤尺寸(p≤0.001)和少于脱滴虫延伸的较低频率(p≤0.001)和宫颈淋巴结(LN)转移(p≤≤0.001),而不是IFVPTC。超声检查(US)发现,术前缩细胞病理学诊断以及EFVPTCS和IFVPTCS之间的BRAF突变的患病率存在​​显着差异。在105名患者(39%)的89名患者(33%)和非侵入性EFVPTC中诊断出侵袭性EFVPTCs。非侵入性亚型具有较小的肿瘤尺寸(p?= 0.001)和血管侵袭的较低频率(p?= 0.04)和宫颈LN转移(p?= 0.02)。在侵入性和非侵入性EFVPTCS之间,术前美国发现和细胞病变诊断没有显着差异。结论EFVPTCS的临床病理特征,包括术前美国调查结果不同于IFVPTCS。然而,术前放射和缩细胞病理学发现不能区分非侵入性和侵袭性EFVPTC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号