首页> 外文期刊>Journal of surgical education >A Multicenter Prospective Comparison of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones: Clinical Competency Committee vs. Resident Self-Assessment
【24h】

A Multicenter Prospective Comparison of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones: Clinical Competency Committee vs. Resident Self-Assessment

机译:研究生医学教育里程碑认证委员会的多中心预期比较:临床能力委员会与居民自我评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires accredited residency programs to implement competency-based assessments of medical trainees based upon nationally established Milestones. Clinical competency committees (CCC) are required to prepare biannual reports using the Milestones and ensure reporting to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Previous research demonstrated a strong correlation between CCC and resident scores on the Milestones at 1 institution. We sought to evaluate a national sampling of general surgery residency programs and hypothesized that CCC and resident assessments are similar. Design Details regarding the makeup and process of each CCC were obtained. Major disparities were defined as an absolute mean difference of ≥0.5 on the 4-point scale. A negative assessment disparity indicated that the residents evaluated themselves at a lower level than did the CCC. Statistical analysis included Wilcoxon rank sum and Sign tests. Setting CCCs and categorical general surgery residents from 15 residency programs completed the Milestones document independently during the spring of 2016. Results Overall, 334 residents were included; 44 (13%) and 43 (13%) residents scored themselves ≥0.5 points higher and lower than the CCC, respectively. Female residents scored themselves a mean of 0.08 points lower, and male residents scored themselves a mean of 0.03 points higher than the CCC. Median assessment differences for postgraduate year (PGY) 1-5 were 0.03 (range: ?0.94 to 1.28), ?0.11 (range: ?1.22 to 1.22), ?0.08 (range: ?1.28 to 0.81), 0.02 (range: ?0.91 to 1.00), and ?0.19 (range: ?1.16 to 0.50), respectively. Residents in university vs. independent programs had higher rates of negative assessment differences in medical knowledge (15% vs. 6%; P = 0.015), patient care (17% vs. 5%; P = 0.002), professionalism (23% vs. 14%; P = 0.013), and system-based practice (18% vs. 9%; P = 0.031) competencies. Major assessment disparities by sex or PGY were similar among individual competencies. Conclusions Surgery residents in this national cohort demonstrated self-awareness when compared to assessments by their respective CCCs. This was independent of program type, sex, or level of training. PGY 5 residents, female residents, and those from university programs consistently rated themselves lower than the CCC, but these were not major disparities and the significance of this is unclear.
机译:目标毕业生教育认证委员会需要认可的居住计划,以落实基于国家设立的里程碑的医疗学员的能力评估。临床能力委员会(CCC)需要使用里程碑准备两年报报告,并确保向研究生医学教育审理认证委员会。以前的研究表明,CCC与1个机构的里程碑上的居民评分之间的强烈相关性。我们试图评估一般外科居住计划的国家采样,并假设CCC和驻地评估相似。获得了关于每个CCC的化妆和过程的设计细节。主要差异被定义为4分尺度的绝对平均差异≥0.5。负评估差距表明,居民在较低水平中评估的居民比CCC在较低水平下。统计分析包括Wilcoxon等级和标志测试。在2016年春季设定15名居住计划中的CCC和分类普通外科居民在2016年春季完成了里程碑文件。总体而言,包括334名居民; 44(13%)和43(13%)居民分别升级≥0.5点,分别高于CCC。女性居民分别均为0.08点的平均值,男性居民分为比CCC高0.03点的平均值。研究生年份(PGY)1-5的中值评估差异为0.03(范围:0.94至1.28),?0.11(范围:?1.22至1.22),?0.08(范围:?1.28至0.81),0.02(范围:? 0.91至1.00),以及?0.19(范围:?1.16至0.50)。大学居民与独立计划的医学知识差异较高(15%对6%; P = 0.015),患者护理(17%与5%; P = 0.002),专业性(23%VS 。14%; p = 0.013),基于系统的实践(18%与9%; P = 0.031)竞争力。个人能力之间的性别或PGY的主要评估差异相似。结论与各自CCC的评估相比,本国家队列中的手术居民表现出自我意识。这与计划类型,性别或培训水平无关。 PGY 5居民,女性居民和大学课程的人始终如一地评定到CCC,但这些不是重大差异,而且对此的重要性尚不清楚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号