首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >From the Editors' Desk: Why Does Not Improvement in Communication Lead to Improvement in 'Hard' Outcomes?
【24h】

From the Editors' Desk: Why Does Not Improvement in Communication Lead to Improvement in 'Hard' Outcomes?

机译:从编辑者的办公桌:为什么不改善通信导致“硬”结果的改善?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The quality of communication is important in provider-patient interactions. Studies have consistently shown that encounters that are more interactive result in patients with higher levels of satisfaction and trust. What has been more difficult to achieve is translating improvement in communication to other outcomes, such as improved hypertension or diabetes control. Most studies of communication interventions that have looked for effects beyond improvement in satisfaction have found no benefit. This is surprising since improvement in communication can lead to improved adherence to treatment regimens and adherence has been shown to be critical to improvement in some outcomes, such as blood pressure control.
机译:沟通质量在提供者 - 患者互动中很重要。 研究一直表明,遇到更高的满足度和信任患者的患者更具互动性。 更难以实现的是翻译与其他结果的通信的改善,例如改善的高血压或糖尿病控制。 大多数关于满足满足感改善的影响的通信干预研究发现没有任何好处。 这令人惊讶的是,由于通信的改善可能导致改善治疗方案的依从性,并且粘附在一些结果中的改善至关重要,例如血压控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号