首页> 外文期刊>Journal of general internal medicine >Pain adversely affects outcomes to a collaborative care intervention for anxiety in primary care
【24h】

Pain adversely affects outcomes to a collaborative care intervention for anxiety in primary care

机译:疼痛对初级保健焦虑的合作护理干预产生不利影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Primary care patients with Panic Disorder (PD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) experience poorer than expected clinical outcomes, despite the availability of efficacious pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments. A barrier to recovery from PD/GAD may be the co-occurrence of pain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether pain intensity interfered with treatment response for PD and/or GAD in primary care patients who had received collaborative care for anxiety disorders. DESIGN: A secondary data analysis of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial comparing a telephone-delivered collaborative care intervention for primary care patients with severe PD and/or GAD to their doctor's "usual" care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients had to have a diagnosis of PD and/or GAD and a severe level of anxiety symptoms. The 124 patients randomized at baseline to the collaborative care intervention were analyzed. Participants were divided into two pain intensity groups based on their response to the SF-36 Bodily Pain scale (none or mild pain vs. at least moderate pain). MAIN MEASURES: Pain was assessed using the Bodily Pain scale of the SF-36. Anxiety symptoms were measured with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HRS-A), Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Severity Scale (GADSS). Measures were collected over 12 months. KEY Results: At baseline, patients with at least moderate pain were significantly more likely to endorse more anxiety symptoms on the HRS-A than patients with no pain or mild pain (P <.001). Among patients with severe anxiety symptoms, 65 % (80/124) endorsed experiencing at least moderate pain in the previous month. A significantly lesser number of patients achieved a 50 % improvement at 12 months on the HRS-A and GADSS if they had at least moderate pain as compared to patients with little or no pain (P = 0.01 and P = 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Coexisting pain was common in a sample of primary care patients with severe PD/GAD, and appeared to negatively affect response to anxiety treatment. ? 2012 Society of General Internal Medicine.
机译:背景:尽管有效的药理学和非药剂学治疗有用,但初级护理患者(PD)和广义焦虑症(GAD)经验差别比预期的临床结果差。从PD / GAD恢复的障碍可能是疼痛的共同发生。目的:评价疼痛强度是否干扰Pd和/或GAD在初级护理患者中的治疗反应,该患者接受焦虑症的合作障碍。设计:随机,受控效果试验的二级数据分析,比较电话交付的合作护理干预针对严重PD和/或加入医生的“通常”护理的初级护理患者。参与者:患者必须诊断PD和/或GAD和严重的焦虑症状。分析了在基线随机化的124名患者进行了协作护理干预。将参与者根据对SF-36体疼痛量表的反应分为两种疼痛强度,(没有或轻微疼痛,至少适中疼痛)。主要措施:使用SF-36的身体疼痛量表评估疼痛。用汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HRS-A),恐慌症严重规模(PDS)和广泛性焦虑症严重尺度(GADS)测量焦虑症状。在12个月内收集措施。关键结果:在基线时,至少疼痛至少的患者在HRS-A上的患者比没有疼痛或轻微疼痛的患者(P <.001)。在患有严重焦虑症状的患者中,65%(80/124)在上个月内认可至少经历中度疼痛。如果与疼痛少或没有疼痛的患者相比,在HRS-A和GADS中,患者的12个月,患者较少的患者数量显着较少,患者达到50%的改善(P = 0.01和P = 0.04)。结论:在严重PD / GAD的初级护理患者样本中共存疼痛常见,并且似乎对焦虑治疗的反应产生负面影响。还2012年一般内科学会。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Division of General Internal Medicine Center for Research on Health Care University of Pittsburgh;

    Division of General Internal Medicine Center for Research on Health Care University of Pittsburgh;

    Department of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh;

    Department of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health Pittsburgh;

    Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System;

    Division of General Internal Medicine Center for Research on Health Care University of Pittsburgh;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 内科学;
  • 关键词

    clinical trial; collaborative care; generalized anxiety disorder; pain; panic disorder;

    机译:临床试验;合作护理;广义焦虑症;疼痛;恐慌症;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号