首页> 外文期刊>Journal of viral hepatitis. >Comparison of effectiveness and discontinuation of interferon‐free therapy for hepatitis C in prison inmates and noninmates
【24h】

Comparison of effectiveness and discontinuation of interferon‐free therapy for hepatitis C in prison inmates and noninmates

机译:无干扰素治疗丙型肝炎囚犯与无乳腺炎的无干扰素治疗的效果与停止比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Summary Chronic hepatitis C treatment with direct acting antiviral ( DAA ) therapy during incarceration is an attractive option, due to its short duration and to the possibility of directly observed treatment or supervision. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness and rates of discontinuation of DAA treatment in prisoners and nonprisoners. We studied all patients treated in the 10 prisons of Catalonia and at 3 public hospitals in the Barcelona area between 1 January 2015 and 30 April 2016. We analysed sustained viral response ( SVR ) and rates of discontinuation through intention‐to‐treat and modified‐intention‐to‐treat analyses, the latter excluding discontinuations due to release from prison. One hundred and eighty‐eight inmates and 862 noninmates were included. Prisoners were significantly younger than nonprisoners, with higher proportions of men, drug users, HIV infection, genotypes 1a and 3 and more treatment with psychiatric drugs. Overall, 98.4% of patients completed treatment. The discontinuation rate was low, but higher in inmates (3.7% vs 1.2% noninmates; P ?=?.003) and in community patients 65?years old (2.8% vs 1.2% in under 65?seconds; P ?=?.008). Among the inmates, 7 (42.8%) discontinuations were due to release. SVR was 93.1% in inmates vs 96.5% in noninmates ( P ?=?.08) by intention‐to‐treat and 95.1% vs 96.5% ( P ?=?.37) by modified intention‐to‐treat. Virologic failure rates were similar (3.8% vs 3% in noninmates; P ?=?.60). SVR , virologic failure and discontinuation rates were similar in inmates and noninmates. Currently, prisons are considered a priority for the implementation of DAA . Improved coordination between penitentiary and community health systems would help to ensure therapeutic continuity in released prisoners.
机译:发明内容在监禁期间用直接作用抗病毒(DAA)治疗的慢性丙型肝炎治疗是一种有吸引力的选择,因为它的持续时间短,并且可能直接观察到治疗或监督。本研究的目的是比较DAA治疗在囚犯和非家庭中停止的有效性和率。我们研究了在2015年1月1日至2016年4月30日至2016年4月30日至2016年4月30日至3月30日在加泰罗尼亚的10个公共医院治疗的所有患者。我们通过意向治疗和修改了,我们分析了持续的病毒反应(SVR)和停药率意向治疗分析,后者由于监狱释放而排除停止。包括一百八十八十八囚犯和862名无关人。囚犯比非家庭更年轻,男性,吸毒者,艾滋病毒感染,基因型1A和3种和3种患有精神毒性药物的治疗更高。总体而言,98.4%的患者完成治疗。中断率低,但囚犯中较高(3.7%vs 1.2%的梭菌; p?= 003)和社区患者& 65岁(65岁以下的2.8%vs 1.2%?秒; p?p?= ?.008)。在囚犯中,7(42.8%)的停止是由于释放。通过意向治疗,SVR在囚犯患有93.1%的囚犯与96.5%(p?=Δ.08),通过修改意向治疗,95.1%与96.5%(p?= 37)。病毒学破坏率相似(诺孕属3.8%vs 3%; p?=Δ.60)。 SVR,病毒学失败和中断率在囚犯和野生酸盐中相似。目前,监狱被认为是执行DAA的优先事项。改善监狱和社区卫生系统之间的协调将有助于确保公布囚犯的治疗连续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号