首页> 外文期刊>Journal of viral hepatitis. >Mortality, liver transplantation and hepatic complications in patients with treatment‐na?ve chronic hepatitis B treated with entecavir vs tenofovir
【24h】

Mortality, liver transplantation and hepatic complications in patients with treatment‐na?ve chronic hepatitis B treated with entecavir vs tenofovir

机译:用恩替卡韦治疗治疗 - Na'Ve慢性乙型肝炎患者的死亡率,肝移植和肝复杂性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Summary Few studies have directly compared the long‐term clinical outcomes of entecavir ( ETV ) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ( TDF ). This study aimed to compare the risk of mortality, liver transplantation and hepatic complications including hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC ) and hepatic decompensation between these drugs in treatment‐na?ve chronic hepatitis B ( CHB ). We performed a longitudinal observational analysis of data from 1325 consecutive adult CHB patients with a cumulative adherence of ≥80% to treatment with ETV (n?=?721) or TDF (n?=?604) at a tertiary referral hospital in Ulsan, Korea, from 1 January 2007 through 31 April 2017. Among the patients, 708 were analysed using propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:1. In the follow‐up period of up to 5?years, five patients (0.4%) died, three patients (0.2%) underwent liver transplantation ( LT ) and 54 patients (4.1%) developed HCC . Hepatic decompensation occurred in 24 (1.8%) patients. ETV therapy did not significantly differ from TDF therapy regarding the risk of liver‐related death or LT ( HR 0.96; 95% CI , 0.23‐4.07; log‐rank P? = ? 0.955), HCC ( HR , 1.36; 95% CI , 0.72‐2.56; log‐rank P? = ? 0.340) and hepatic decompensation ( HR , 1.64; 95% CI , 0.67‐4.00; log‐rank P? = ? 0.276). In the 708 propensity‐matched pairs, ETV and TDF were also not significantly different with respect to the risk of mortality, LT and hepatic complications. In this longitudinal observational study of 1325 patients with CHB , ETV and TDF therapies were not significantly different regarding the risk of mortality, HCC , LT and hepatic decompensation.
机译:发明内容少数研究直接比较了Entecavir(ETV)和替诺福韦富马酸骨(TDF)的长期临床结果。该研究旨在比较死亡率,肝移植和肝脏并发症,包括肝细胞癌(HCC)和治疗中这些药物之间的肝脏代言 - 慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)。我们对来自1325名连续成人CHB患者的数据进行了纵向观察分析,其累积依从性≥80%,以在Ulsan的第三节推荐医院治疗(N?= 721)或TDF(n?= 604)。从2007年1月1日至2017年4月31日至4月31日的韩国。在患者中,使用与1:1的比例匹配的倾向得分分析708。在最多5岁的后续期间,五名患者(0.4%)死亡,三名患者(0.2%)接受肝移植(LT)和54名患者(4.1%)发育的HCC。 24例(1.8%)患者发生肝脏失代偿。与肝相关死亡或HR 0.96; 95%CI,0.23-4.07; log-rank p?= 0.955),HCC(HR,1.36; 95%CI),ETV治疗没有显着差异。与肝相关的死亡或肝脏相关死亡的风险没有显着差异,0.72-2.56; log-rank p?=?0.340)和肝脏失代偿(hr,1.64; 95%ci,0.67-4.00; log-andlup p?=?0.276)。在708型匹配对中,对于死亡率,道茨和肝并发症的风险也没有显着差异。在这项纵向观察到1325例CHB患者,ETV和TDF疗法的研究方面没有显着差异,关于死亡率,HCC,LT和肝脏失代偿的风险。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of viral hepatitis.》 |2018年第s1期|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

    Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineUlsan Korea;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传染病;
  • 关键词

    entecavir; hepatic decompensation; hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; tenofovir;

    机译:Entecavir;肝脏失代偿;乙型肝炎病毒;肝细胞癌;替诺福韦;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号