首页> 外文期刊>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery: official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract >Returns to Operating Room After Colon and Rectal Surgery in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center: a Valid Measure of Surgical Quality?
【24h】

Returns to Operating Room After Colon and Rectal Surgery in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center: a Valid Measure of Surgical Quality?

机译:在三级护理学术医疗中心结肠和直肠手术后返回手术室:有效的外科素质吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Abstract Introduction Returns to the operating room (ROR) have been suggested as a marker of surgical quality. Increasingly, quality and value metrics are utilized for reimbursement as well as public reporting to inform health care consumers. We sought to understand the etiology of ROR and assess the validity of simple ROR as a quality metric. Methods This was a single referral center retrospective review of all colon and rectal operations between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014. Surgical Systems Nurse?+?was constructed and validated at our institution for classifying ROR as either an unplanned return to the OR, planned return due to complications, planned staged return, or an unrelated return. The primary outcome was the classification of ROR and total number of ROR within 30 days. Results Of the 2389 colorectal patients who underwent surgery between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014; 214 returned to the operating room within 30 days (9.0%). Among the 214 patients, there were a total of 232 ROR with an average of 1.1 ROR per patient (range 1–4); 90 (38.8%) were unplanned ROR, 49 (21.1%) were planned returns due to complications, 92 (39.7%) were planned staged returns, and 1 (0.4%) were unrelated ROR. The most common reason for an unplanned ROR was an anastomotic leak ( n ?=?21; 9.1%). Overall, unplanned reoperations were rare events ( n ?=?90/2389; 3.8%), largely comprised of patients experiencing an anastomotic abscess or leak ( n =21/2389; 0.9%). Conclusions In a high volume and complexity academic colon and rectal surgery practice, RORs within 30 days occurred after 10.4% of cases. Unplanned ROR were relatively rare and most commonly associated with an anastomotic leak. Since the majority of ROR were planned-staged returns, overall rate of ROR should be questioned as a metric of surgical quality. Perhaps, the anastomotic leak rate may be a better metric to monitor for quality improvement efforts.
机译:摘要介绍返回手术室(ROR)被建议作为手术质量的标志。越来越多地,质量和价值指标用于报销以及公开报告,以通知医疗保健消费者。我们试图了解ROR的病因,并评估简单ROR作为质量指标的有效性。方法是2014年1月1日和2014年12月31日之间的所有冒号和直肠行动的单一推荐中心回顾性审查,由于并发症,计划返回或无关的回报,计划的回报。主要结果是在30天内的ROR和ROR总数的分类。 2014年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间的2389名结肠直肠患者的结果; 214在30天内返回手术室(9.0%)。在214例患者中,总共232个ROL平均每位患者平均1.1 ror(范围1-4); 90(38.8%)是计划生意外的ROR,计划返回49(21.1%)由于并发症,计划分阶段返回92(39.7%),1(0.4%)是无关的ROR。无计划的ROR最常见的原因是吻合泄漏(n?= 21; 9.1%)。总体而言,无计划的重新进入是罕见的事件(n?= 90/2389; 3.8%),主要由经历吻合口脓肿或泄漏的患者(n = 21/2389; 0.9%)。结论在大量和复杂性学术结肠和直肠手术实践中,在10.4%的病例后发生30天内的ROR。没有计划的ROR比较罕见,最常见的是与吻合泄漏有关。由于大多数ROR是计划分阶段的回报,因此ROR的总体速率应质疑为手术质量的指标。也许,吻合泄漏率可能是监测质量改进努力的更好的指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号