首页> 外文期刊>Journal of vibration and control: JVC >Seismic performance of ribbed bracing system in passive control of structures
【24h】

Seismic performance of ribbed bracing system in passive control of structures

机译:罗纹支撑系统中的抗被动控制中的抗震性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, a novel passive control system, ribbed bracing system (RBS), has been proposed to deal with the buckling problem. RBS is a bracing system with a simple mechanism that can be installed in braces as a supplemental part. The behavior of RBS is similar to that of conventional braces under tensile loading. However, under compressive force, it endures an insignificant force and prevents the braces from buckling through length reduction. In addition, seismic damage is concentrated in the bracing system of the structures equipped with RBS, decreasing the dissipated hysteretic energy in other structural members. There are two different mechanisms for RBS: 1) completely-closed RBS (CC-RBS) and 2) self-centering RBS (SC-RBS). The concept and mechanics of RBS have been verified by the results obtained from cyclic testing and numerical analysis of RBS specimens. In this research, after describing the mechanical configuration of RBS, nonlinear time history analysis has been conducted on 3-story and 6-story concentrically braced frames subjected to different seismic intensity levels, design basis earthquakes (DBE), and maximum considered earthquakes (MCE). The analyses have been performed on different types of bracing systems as follows: SC-RBS, CC-RBS, and Buckling Restrained Braces (BRB). The results show that SC-RBS frames have negligible residual story drifts, and maximum displacement in CC-RBS is slightly lower than that of BRB. Additionally, distribution of input energy into the structure was considered and showed that RBS frames demonstrate a high hysteretic energy dissipation, which results in lower demands in other structural elements.
机译:在本文中,已经提出了一种新型的被动控制系统,罗纹支撑系统(RBS),以处理屈曲问题。 RBS是一种支撑系统,具有一个简单的机制,可以作为补充部分的括号安装。 RBS的行为与拉伸负载下的常规牙套的行为类似。然而,在抗压力下,它持续性力不足,并防止牙箍减少长度屈曲。此外,抗震损伤集中在配备RB的结构的支撑系统中,降低了其他结构构件中的消散滞后能量。 RBS:1)有两种不同的机制:1)完全闭合的RB(CC-RB)和2)自定心RB(SC-RB)。 RBS的概念和力学通过从RBS样本的循环测试和数值分析获得的结果验证。在本研究中,在描述RB的机械结构之后,在3层和6层的同心支撑框架上进行了非线性时间历史分析,其经受不同地震强度水平,设计基地地震(DBE)以及最大被认为地震(MCE )。分析已经在不同类型的支撑系统上进行,如下:SC-RB,CC-RB和屈曲束缚括号(BRB)。结果表明,SC-RBS帧具有可忽略的残余故事漂移,CC-RB中的最大位移略低于BRB。另外,考虑了输入能量进入结构的分布,并显示RBS框架表现出高滞后能量耗散,这导致其他结构元素的需求较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号