Complications associated with the use of urokinase and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for catheter-directed peripheral arterial and venous thrombolysis.

摘要

PURPOSE: Catheter-directed thrombolytic dissolution of peripheral arterial and venous thrombus is in widespread use, yet the frequency and nature of associated complications remain ill defined. In an effort to better characterize the complications associated with urokinase (UK) and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), the clinical course of patients treated for lower extremity vascular occlusions at a single institution was reviewed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 9-year period, 653 consecutive patients were treated for lower extremity arterial (527 patients) or venous (126 patients) occlusions with catheter-directed UK (483 patients), rt-PA (144 patients), or both (26 patients). Decisions regarding the choice of thrombolytic agent were made by the clinician. In-hospital complications were subcategorized into hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic events and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was specifically tabulated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographics or clinical presentation of patients treated with either UK or rt-PA. Bleeding complications occurred less often in the patients treated with UK (insertion site hematoma 21.9% vs. 43.8%, P<.0001, any bleeding necessitating transfusion 12.4% vs. 22.2%, P = .004, and intracranial hemorrhage 0.6% vs. 2.8%, P = .031). Cardiopulmonary complications necessitating transfer to the intensive care unit occurred more frequently in the patients treated with rt-PA (4.9% vs. 1.5%, P = .015). The risk of mortality was not statistically different between the UK and rt-PA treated patients (2.7% vs. 6.2%, P = .221). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis appears safer with UK than with rt-PA, with a lower incidence of hemorrhagic complications. It is possible that this finding is related to differential dosing regimens or intrinsic pharmacologic differences between the agents. The observations of this retrospective analysis require confirmation with a prospective, randomized evaluation.