...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of cardiovascular drugs: drugs, devices, and other interventions >Does a single-pill antihypertensive/lipid-lowering regimen improve adherence in US managed care enrolees? A non-randomized, observational, retrospective study.
【24h】

Does a single-pill antihypertensive/lipid-lowering regimen improve adherence in US managed care enrolees? A non-randomized, observational, retrospective study.

机译:单药降压/降脂方案是否可以改善美国管理式护理入组者的依从性?一项非随机,观察性,回顾性研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: A previous study in 4703 patients suggested that a single-pill combination of amlodipine and atorvastatin is associated with greater adherence to therapy than a two-pill calcium channel antagonist (calcium channel blocker [CCB]) and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) regimen. However, the impact of prior medication use on the potential adherence benefits of single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To compare adherence to single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill CCB + statin regimens in a large managed care population, stratified according to prior CCB and statin use. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted among managed care enrolees in the US. Patients included in the analysis had to have a pharmacy claim for single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin or claims for both a CCB and a statin within any 30-day window between April 2004 and April 2005. Adherence was measured over 6 months following the index date (the date of the first single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin claim or of the claim for the second medication class for any two-pill CCB + statin regimen) as the proportion of days covered (PDC) by both CCB and statin therapy; patients were considered 'adherent' if PDC was > or =80%. Patients were divided into four cohorts based on pre-index CCB and statin use: (i) naive (CCB)aive (statin); (ii) experienced (CCB)aive (statin); (iii) naive (CCB)/experienced (statin); and (iv) experienced (CCB)/experienced (statin). Within each cohort, adherence was compared for patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin or other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (including amlodipine or atorvastatin but not both) at index. Multivariable logistic regression with propensity score weighting was used to adjust for covariates, including age, sex and co-morbidities. RESULTS: In total, 35,430 patients were included in the analysis. At month 6 (after adjusting for covariates), patients in the experienced (CCB)aive (statin) cohort receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin were more than twice as likely to be adherent as those receiving two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (odds ratio [OR] 2.20; p < 0.0001) or other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 2.75; p < 0.0001). Similarly, patients in the naive (CCB)/experienced (statin) cohort receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin were more likely to be adherent than those receiving two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (OR 1.72; p < 0.0001) or other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 2.81; p < 0.0001). In contrast, in the naive (CCB)aive (statin) cohort there was no significant difference in adherence between patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (OR 1.00), although patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin were slightly more likely to be adherent than those receiving other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 1.29; p < 0.01). In the experienced (CCB)/experienced (statin) cohort there was also no significant difference between patients receiving single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus two-pill amlodipine + atorvastatin (OR 1.08), and only a slightly greater likelihood of achieving adherence to single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin versus other two-pill CCB + statin regimens (OR 1.19; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective study confirms previous observations that single-pill amlodipine/atorvastatin can help improve adherence versus two-pill CCB + statin regimens. However, greater improvements in adherence are likely to be observed in patients with prior experience of either CCB or statin therapy than in those either naive to, or experienced with, both therapies.
机译:背景:一项针对4703名患者的先前研究表明,氨氯地平和阿托伐他汀的单药组合比两药钙通道拮抗剂(钙通道阻滞剂[CCB])和HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂(他汀类药物)对治疗的依从性更高。 )养生。但是,尚未研究过以前的药物使用对单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀的潜在依从性益处的影响。目的:比较按既往CCB和他汀类药物使用情况分层的大型管理护理人群中单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀与两剂CCB +他汀类药物的依从性。方法:这项回顾性研究是在美国的管理式护理参与者中进行的。分析中包括的患者必须在2004年4月至2005年4月的任何30天之内对单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀药房索赔,或者对CCB和他汀类药物同时索赔。在索引日期后的6个月内测量粘附性(第一个单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀索赔日期或任何两药CCB +他汀类药物方案的第二种药物类别索赔的日期)为CCB和他汀类药物治疗所涵盖的天数(PDC);如果PDC>或= 80%,则认为患者为“依从性”。根据预索引CCB和他汀类药物的使用,将患者分为四个队列:(i)初次使用(CCB)/初次使用(他汀类药物); (ii)有经验的(CCB)/天真(他汀); (iii)天真的(CCB)/经验丰富的(他汀); (iv)有经验的(CCB)/有经验的(他汀)。在每个队列中,比较接受单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀与两药氨氯地平+阿托伐他汀或其他两药CCB +他汀方案(包括氨氯地平或阿托伐他汀,但非两者)的患者的依从性。倾向得分加权的多变量逻辑回归用于调整协变量,包括年龄,性别和合并症。结果:总共包括35,430例患者被纳入分析。在第6个月(经过协变量调整后),经验丰富(CCB)/天真的(他汀类药物)队列中接受单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀的患者的依从性是接受两药氨氯地平+阿托伐他汀(单数)的患者的两倍以上比率[OR] 2.20; p <0.0001)或其他两药CCB +他汀类药物方案(OR 2.75; p <0.0001)。同样,与单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀单药的经历相比,接受单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀治疗的天真的(CCB)/经验丰富(他汀)队列中的患者比接受两药氨氯地平+阿托伐他汀(OR 1.72; p <0.0001)或其他两药的患者更有可能坚持治疗。 CCB +他汀类药物方案(OR 2.81; p <0.0001)。相比之下,在天真的(CCB)/天真的(他汀)队列中,尽管接受单药氨氯地平单药的患者与接受单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀的两药和氨氯地平+阿托伐他汀两药(OR 1.00)的依从性没有显着差异/阿托伐他汀比接受其他两药CCB +他汀方案的患者更有可能坚持治疗(OR 1.29; p <0.01)。在有经验的(CCB)/有经验的(他汀)队列中,单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀与两药氨氯地平+阿托伐他汀(OR 1.08)的患者之间也没有显着差异,实现单药依从性的可能性仅稍高-氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀片与其他两剂CCB +他汀类药物相比(OR 1.19; p <0.01)。结论:这项大型回顾性研究证实了先前的观察结果,即单药氨氯地平/阿托伐他汀相对于两药CCB +他汀类药物方案可以帮助改善依从性。但是,与没有使用这两种疗法或都没有这两种疗法的患者相比,有CCB或他汀类药物治疗经验的患者可能会观察到更大的依从性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号