首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Vegetation Science >Do plant modules describe community structure better than biomass? A comparison of three abundance measures
【24h】

Do plant modules describe community structure better than biomass? A comparison of three abundance measures

机译:植物模块是否比生物量更好地描述社区结构? 三种丰富措施的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Plants are composed of modules, such as shoots and leaves. However, modules have been overlooked as potential abundance measures in describing plant communities. We sampled 8 communities, to examine whether module counts gave different conclusions from biomass on community structure, and better discriminated between communities. Different abundance measures - number of leaves, number of shoots and photosynthetic biomass - gave different results for between-site comparisons of evenness and rank consistency. Since evenness is intended to represent a feature of the whole community, it should vary more between communities than within; module-based abundance achieved this better than biomass. It is speculated that the restrictions on species co-occurrences when plant communities assemble may sometimes be based on the number of modules rather than on biomass.
机译:植物由模块组成,例如芽和叶子。 然而,模块被忽视为描述植物群落时的潜在丰富措施。 我们采样了8个社区,检查模块计数是否从社区结构上产生了不同的结论,并且在社区之间更好地歧视。 不同的丰度措施 - 叶片数,射击数量和光合生物量 - 为平均性和等级的场地比较和等级持续性之间提供了不同的结果。 由于均匀性旨在代表整个社区的一个特征,因此社区之间的内容也会变得比内部更多; 基于模块的丰度实现了比生物量更好。 据推测,当植物社区组装时,对物种共同的限制有时可以基于模块的数量而不是在生物质上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号