...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of cardiovascular drugs: drugs, devices, and other interventions >Comparison of antiplatelet effect and safety of clopidogrel napadisilate with clopidogrel bisulfate in coronary artery disease patients: Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase iv, non-inferiority clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of antiplatelet effect and safety of clopidogrel napadisilate with clopidogrel bisulfate in coronary artery disease patients: Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase iv, non-inferiority clinical trial

机译:氯吡格雷萘普西酯和硫酸氢氯吡格雷在冠心病患者中的抗血小板作用和安全性比较:多中心,随机,双盲,iv期,非劣效性临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Clopidogrel napadisilate has better clopidogrel stability than clopidogrel bisulfate. There are no data, however, on the antiplatelet efficacy and tolerability of clopidogrel napadisilate in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Objective: The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the combination therapy of aspirin and clopidogrel napadisilate is not inferior to that of aspirin and clopidogrel bisulfate with respect to its effectiveness in inhibiting platelet aggregation, if it is given for 4 weeks to CAD patients who had been treated with a drug-eluting stent more than 12 months prior and had remained in a stable condition with a single antiplatelet agent, aspirin. Methods: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase IV clinical trial. A total of 162 patients were prospectively recruited from three centers. The subjects were randomized to either the test group that was treated with 75 mg of clopidogrel napadisilate once daily or to the control group that was treated with 75 mg of clopidogrel bisulfate once daily. The primary outcome was the percent inhibition of the platelet aggregation change after the medication, as assessed by a VerifyNow? P2Y12 assay. The secondary outcome was the change in P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) from the baseline to the end of 4 weeks of treatment. The prevalence of adverse events was assessed at each visit through a direct interview. Results: The mean increase in the percent inhibition after 4 weeks of treatment was 19.4 % in the clopidogrel napadisilate group and 19.5 % in the clopidogrel bisulfate group. The lower bound of the 95 % two-sided confidence interval for the difference in the change between the two groups (-5.46) was greater than the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of (-10.5). Therefore, clopidogrel napadisilate was deemed non-inferior to clopidogrel bisulfate with respect to its effectiveness in inhibiting platelet aggregation. The PRU decreased by 73.1 ± 30.7 in the clopidogrel napadisilate group, which decreased by -7.8 more than in the clopidogrel bisulfate group (65.3 ± 62.1); but the difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant (p = 0.435). There was no significant difference in the drug-related adverse events between the two groups (12.3 vs. 10.1 %; p = 0.804). Conclusion: The platelet inhibitory efficacy of clopidogrel napadisilate is not inferior to that of clopidogrel bisulfate. There were also no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in the safety analyses. Therefore, clopidogrel napadisilate can be a suitable alternative to clopidogrel bisulfate in stable CAD patients who have undergone a drug-eluting stent placement. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01830491.
机译:背景:萘吡格雷氯吡格雷比硫酸氢氯吡格雷具有更好的氯吡格雷稳定性。但是,尚无有关萘吡格雷的氯吡格雷在冠心病(CAD)患者中的抗血小板功效和耐受性的数据。目的:本研究旨在证明阿司匹林和纳哌西吡氯吡格雷的联合治疗在抑制血小板聚集方面的效果不劣于阿司匹林和硫酸氢氯吡格雷的联合治疗,如果CAD患者接受4周的联合治疗已使用药物洗脱支架治疗超过12个月,并且仅使用一种抗血小板药阿司匹林保持稳定状态。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性,随机,双盲,双假人,平行组,IV期临床试验。前瞻性地从三个中心招募了162名患者。受试者被随机分为每天一次接受75毫克萘达吡酯氯吡格雷治疗的测试组或每天一次接受75毫克硫酸氢氯吡格雷治疗的对照组。主要结果是用药后对血小板凝集变化的抑制百分比,由VerifyNow?评估。 P2Y12测定。次要结果是从基线到治疗4周结束时P2Y12反应单位(PRU)的变化。每次访视时通过直接访谈评估不良事件的发生率。结果:治疗4周后,萘达吡酯氯吡格雷组的平均抑制百分比增加为19.4%,硫酸氢氯吡格雷组为19.5%。两组之间的变化差异(-5.46)的95%双向置信区间的下限大于预定义的非劣效性余量(-10.5)。因此,就其抑制血小板凝集的有效性而言,萘达吡酯氯吡格雷不亚于硫酸氢氯吡格雷。萘达比索氯吡格雷组的PRU下降73.1±30.7,比硫酸氢氯吡格雷组(65.3±62.1)下降-7.8多;但两组之间的差异在统计学上不显着(p = 0.435)。两组之间与药物相关的不良事件没有显着差异(12.3%对10.1%; p = 0.804)。结论:萘哌齐酯对血小板的抑制作用不亚于硫酸氢氯吡格雷。在安全性分析中,两个治疗组之间也没有统计学上的显着差异。因此,在经历过药物洗脱支架置入的稳定型CAD患者中,萘达吡格雷氯吡格雷可以替代硫酸氢氯吡格雷。临床试验注册:在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册为NCT01830491。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号