首页> 外文期刊>American journal of cardiovascular drugs: drugs, devices, and other interventions >Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose amlodipinelosartan and losartan in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled with losartan: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study
【24h】

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose amlodipinelosartan and losartan in hypertensive patients inadequately controlled with losartan: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

机译:固定剂量氨氯地平氯沙坦和氯沙坦在氯沙坦控制不足的高血压患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机,双盲,多中心研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Fixed-dose combination drugs may enhance blood pressure (BP) goal attainment through complementary effects and reduced side effects, which leads to better compliance. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of once-daily combination amlodipine/ losartan versus losartan. Methods: This was an 8-week, double-blind, multicenter, randomized phase III study conducted in outpatient hospital clinics. Korean patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on losartan 100mg were administered amlodipine/losartan 5mg/100mg combination versus losartan 100 mg. The main outcome measures were changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and BP response rate from baseline values, which were assessed after 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: At week 8, both groups achieved significant reductions from baseline in DBP (11.7±7.0 and 3.2±7.9 mmHg), which was significantly greater in the amlodipine/losartan 5mg/100mg combination (n = 70) group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, the amlodipine/losartan 5mg/100mg combination group achieved significantly greater reductions in SBP at week 8 and in SBP and DBP at week 4 compared with the losartan 100mg (n = 72) group (all p < 0.0001). Response rates were significantly higher in the amlodipine/losartan 5mg/100mg group versus the losartan 100mg group (81.4% vs 63.9% at week 4, p < 0.0192; 90.0% vs 66.7% at week 8, p < 0.001). Both treatments were generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Switching to a fixed-dose combination therapy of amlodipine/losartan 5mg/100mg was associated with significantly greater reductions in BP and superior achievement of BP goals compared with a maintenance dose of losartan 100mg in Korean patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled on losartan 100mg. Clinical Trial Registration: Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00940680. Adis
机译:背景:固定剂量联合用药可以通过补充作用和减少的副作用来提高血压(BP)的目标达成率,从而提高依从性。目的:本研究旨在评估每日一次氨氯地平/氯沙坦与氯沙坦联用的疗效和安全性。方法:这是在门诊医院诊所进行的为期8周,双盲,多中心,随机III期研究。与氯沙坦100 mg相比,韩国人对氯沙坦100mg控制不足的原发性高血压患者服用了氨氯地平/氯沙坦5mg / 100mg的组合。主要结果指标是坐位舒张压(DBP)和坐位收缩压(SBP)的变化以及相对于基线值的BP反应率,这些变化是在治疗4周和8周后评估的。还评估了安全性和耐受性。结果:在第8周时,两组的DBP均较基线显着降低(11.7±7.0和3.2±7.9 mmHg),氨氯地平/氯沙坦5mg / 100mg联合治疗组(n = 70)明显更高(p <0.0001) 。此外,与氯沙坦100mg(n = 72)组相比,氨氯地平/氯沙坦5mg / 100mg联合治疗组在第8周的SBP降低以及在第4周的SBP和DBP降低显着更大(所有p <0.0001)。氨氯地平/氯沙坦5mg / 100mg组的反应率显着高于氯沙坦100mg组(第4周时为81.4%vs.63.9%,p <0.0192;第8周时为90.0%vs 66.7%,p <0.001)。两种治疗通常耐受良好。结论:相比于维持剂量洛沙坦100mg的氯沙坦100mg控制剂量不足的韩国原发性高血压患者,改用固定剂量的氨氯地平/氯沙坦5mg / 100mg联合治疗与BP降低显着更大,达到BP目标更好。 。临床试验注册:在Clinicaltrials.gov上注册为NCT00940680。阿迪斯

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号