Reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus and surrounding subclinical lesions

摘要

Abstract Background Diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid ( BP ) and pemphigus is based on clinical features, histology, immunofluorescence and laboratory data. Objectives To evaluate features of BP and pemphigus at reflectance confocal microscopy ( RCM ) and optical coherence tomography ( OCT ) in order to provide a rapid non‐invasive bed‐side diagnosis. Secondary objective was to evaluate the detectability of clinically non‐visible lesions. Methods This was an observational, retrospective, multicentre study in which patients with suspicious lesions for BP or pemphigus underwent clinical assessment, RCM , OCT , blood tests and skin biopsy for histological and direct immunofluorescence examinations from January 2014 to December 2015. A total of 72 lesions in 24 selected patients were evaluated. Additionally, apparently unaffected skin at two different distances [near (1–2 cm) and far (2–3 cm)] from each lesion was examined to test subclinical lesion detectability. Results RCM was able to detect subepidermal and intra‐epidermal blisters, respectively, in 75% and 50% of the patients affected by BP and pemphigus. At OCT , the exact blister level was identified in all patients. Acantholytic cells were observed only at RCM in pemphigus (62.5%). Fibrin deposition inside the blisters was only found in BP , evidenced both at RCM and OCT . Among patients with BP , subclinical blisters were detected in nine (9.4%) clinically healthy skin, while among patients with pemphigus were observed in 10 (20.8%) apparently unaffected skin. Conclusion RCM and/or OCT provide useful information for a rapid diagnosis of BP and pemphigus and for the identification of biopsy site. Combined use of RCM and OCT is optimal because associates the higher resolution of RCM with the greater penetration depth of OCT . OCT could be an optimal tool for treatment monitoring, especially in the cases of subclinical lesions. However, histopathologic and immunologic examinations remain the gold standard for establishing the final diagnosis.