...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >Short-term Resource Utilization and Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Acute Hospital Care for Severely Frail Elderly Patients
【24h】

Short-term Resource Utilization and Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Acute Hospital Care for Severely Frail Elderly Patients

机译:急性医院护理综合性老年评估的短期资源利用和成本效益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to estimate the 3-month within-trial cost-effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in acute medical care for frail elderly patients compared to usual medical care, by estimating health-related quality of life and costs from a societal perspective. DesignClinical, prospective, controlled, 1-center intervention trial with 2 parallel groups. InterventionStructured, systematic interdisciplinary CGA-based care in an acute elderly care unit. If the patient fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and there was a bed available at the CGA unit, the patient was included in the intervention group. If no bed was available at the CGA unit, the patient was included in the control group and admitted to a conventional acute medical care unit. Setting and ParticipantsA large county hospital in western Sweden. The trial included 408 frail elderly patients, 75?years or older, in need of acute in-hospital treatment. The patients were allocated to the intervention group (n?= 206) or control group (n?= 202). Mean age of the patients was 85.7?years, and 56% were female. MeasuresThe primary outcome was the adjusted incremental cost-effectiveness ratio associated with the intervention compared to the control at the 3-month follow-up. ResultsWe undertook cost-effectiveness analysis, adjusted by regression analyses, including hospital, primary, and municipal care costs and effects. The difference in the mean adjusted quality-adjusted life years gained between groups at 3?months was 0.0252 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0082-0.0422]. The incremental cost, that is, the difference between the groups, was??3226 US dollars (95% CI:??6167 to??285). ConclusionThe results indicate that the care in a CGA unit for acutely ill frail elderly patients is likely to be cost-effective compared to conventional care after 3?months.
机译:本研究的目的是估算急性医疗患者急性医疗评估(CGA)的3个月内试验成本效益(CGA),与通常的医疗保健相比,通过估计与健康有关的生活质量和成本社会的视角。用2个平行组设计临床,前瞻性,控制,1中心干预试验。急性老年护理单位中的干预结构,系统跨学科CGA治疗。如果患者满足夹杂物标准,并且在CGA单元上有床,则患者包含在干预组中。如果CGA单位没有床,则患者被包含在对照组中,并允许传统的急性医疗单元。瑞典西部的环境和参与者大县医院。该试验包括408名勒克老年患者,75岁,年龄或以上,需要急性内部治疗。将患者分配给干预组(n?= 206)或对照组(n?= 202)。患者的平均年龄为85.7?岁月,56%是女性。 MeasureSthe主要结果是与3个月随访中的控制相比,与介入相关的调整后的增量成本效益。 Resultswe进行成本效益分析,通过回归分析调整,包括医院,小学和市政关怀和效果。在3?月份在组之间获得的平均调整质量调节寿命的差异为0.0252 [95%置信区间(CI):0.0082-0.0422]。增量成本,即群体之间的差异是?3226美元(95%CI:?? 6167至?? 285)。结论结果表明,与常规护理的急性脆弱年龄患者的CGA单位的护理可能与3个月后的常规护理相比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号