...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science >Capnography-guided Endotracheal Intubation as an Alternative to Existing Intubation Methods in Rabbits
【24h】

Capnography-guided Endotracheal Intubation as an Alternative to Existing Intubation Methods in Rabbits

机译:Capnography-Poidootcacheal Intubation作为兔子现有插管方法的替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Rabbits provide a unique challenge for routine endotracheal intubation in clinical practice because of various distinctive anatomic and physiologic features. Many previously proposed methods for endotracheal intubation in rabbits are limited by several factors, including the needs for expensive equipment and high levels of technical expertise. We evaluated capnography for its effectiveness in assisting endotracheal intubation in rabbits. New Zealand white rabbits were divided into 3 groups of 5 animals. In the first 2 groups, mainstream (nondiverting) or sidestream (diverting) capnography (MC and SC groups, respectively) was used; in the third group (LS group), a laryngoscope with a size 00 Miller blade was used to guide endotracheal tube placement. Anesthesia was induced through intramuscular administration of ketamine (10 mg/kg), medetomidine (0.1 mg/kg), and midazolam (1 mg/kg) mixed in the same syringe prior to administration. Intubation time was defined from the point of opening the jaws to the completion of the first capnogram after intubation. Intubation was accomplished successfully in all animals in both capnography groups, but 2 rabbits in the laryngoscopy group could not be intubated. Intubation time was compared among groups was compared by using one-way ANOVA, and posthoc Bonferroni testing was applied to isolate significant differences between groups. The intubation time (mean +/- 1 SD) was 46.4 +/- 12.6 s in the MC group, 147.2 +/- 44.2 s in the SC group, and 385.0 +/- 114.1 in the LS group, with intubation time significantly differing among all groups. In conclusion, both mainstream and sidestream capnography-guided endotracheal intubation techniques were more effective and efficient than conventional laryngoscope-guided endotracheal intubation in rabbits. Furthermore, mainstream capnography was preferred over sidestream capnography because mainstream capnography resulted in significantly shorter intubation times.
机译:由于各种独特的解剖学和生理特征,兔子为常规的临床实践中的常规内伤插管提供了独特的挑战。许多先前提出的用于气管插管中的兔子的方法受到若干因素的限制,包括昂贵设备的需求和高水平的技术专业知识。我们评估了其辅助气管插管在兔子中的有效性的谱系。新西兰白兔分为3组5只动物。在前2组中,使用主流(非衍生)或侧沟(转移)谱(分别)(分别是MC和SC组);在第三组(LS组)中,使用具有尺寸00米勒叶片的喉镜引导内插管放置。通过在给药前在相同注射器中混合的脑内施用氯胺酮(10mg / kg),中氮酰胺(0.1mg / kg)和Midazolam(1mg / kg)诱导麻醉。插管时间由打开钳口的点来完成插管后第一个CAPNograph的点。插管在两种谱系组中的所有动物中成功完成,但喉镜检查组中的2只兔子无法提取。通过使用单向ANOVA比较了在组中比较了插管时间,并应用了POSTHOC Bonferroni测试以分离组之间的显着差异。在MC组中,插管时间(平均值+/- 1 SD)为46.4 +/- 12.6秒,在SC集团中,147.2 +/- 44.2秒,LS组中385.0 +/- 114.1,具有插管时间明显不同在所有群体中。总之,主流和侧流式谱引导的气管插管术比兔子中的常规喉镜引导的气管插管更有效和有效。此外,主流谱系优选在侧流谱谱术中优先,因为主流谱系导致插管时间明显缩短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号