首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN >Intravenous infusion of total dose iron is superior to oral iron in treatment of anemia in peritoneal dialysis patients: a single center comparative study.
【24h】

Intravenous infusion of total dose iron is superior to oral iron in treatment of anemia in peritoneal dialysis patients: a single center comparative study.

机译:总剂量铁的静脉内输注优于口腔抗体治疗腹膜透析患者的贫血:单一中心比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the treatment of anemia of chronic renal failure, the most common cause of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) resistance is iron deficiency. In peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, oral iron therapy is an accepted and convenient method of iron supplementation. The effectiveness of oral iron, however, is limited by many factors, including gastrointestinal side effects and poor gastric absorption. This study prospectively compared the efficacy of single intravenous infusion of total dose iron (ITDI group) given in an outpatient setting with oral iron (oral group) for the treatment of anemia in PD patients. Twenty-five adult stable PD patients with baseline hematocrit 25 to 35% were entered into the study. Thirteen patients with serum transferrin saturation (TSAT) < 25% received ITDI, and 12 patients with TSAT between 25 and 35% received oral iron. One patient in the oral group received emergent blood transfusion and was excluded from analysis. Hematocrit and iron indices were measured at monthly intervals. Doses of rhEPO were adjusted monthly to maintain target hematocrit at 35%. At the end of the study (6 mo), despite similar baseline mean hematocrit (31.0 +/- 0.9 versus 33.0 +/- 1.0%), comparable mean baseline weekly rhEPO dose (7886 +/- 1449 versus 6370 +/- 1553 U/wk), and significantly lower level of mean TSAT (11.3 +/- 3.5 versus 30.1 +/- 3.5%; P < 0.05), the ITDI group when compared with the oral group had significantly higher mean hematocrit (36.0 +/- 1.0 versus 31.4 +/- 1.1%; P < 0.05) and TSAT (33.7 +/- 3.7 versus 22.6 +/- 4.0%; P < 0.05) values. In addition, the final mean dose of weekly rhEPO was significantly lower in the ITDI group (4799 +/- 981 versus 9998 +/- 1027 U/wk; P < 0.05). No patient in the ITDI group developed an adverse reaction to intravenous iron. It is concluded that ITDI represents a more efficacious method of iron supplementation in PD patients receiving rhEPO. Moreover, ITDI is safe and well tolerated and can be administered in an outpatient setting.
机译:在治疗血症慢性肾功能衰竭的贫血中,重组人促红细胞生成素(RHEPO)抗性的最常见原因是铁缺乏。在腹膜透析(PD)患者中,口服铁疗法是一种接受和方便的铁补充方法。然而,口服铁的有效性受到许多因素的限制,包括胃肠副作用和胃部吸收不良。本研究预期比较了在具有口服铁(口服组)的外部剂量铁(OTDI组)中的单一静脉内输注的功效,用于治疗PD患者贫血。研究了二十五名成人稳定的PD患者,血细胞比容为25%至35%的研究。十三个患者血清转移素饱和度(TSAT)<25%接受ITDI,12例TSAT的1例在25%至35%之间接受口服铁。口腔群中的一名患者接受了急产输血,并被排除在分析之外。血细胞比容和铁指数按月间隔测量。每月调整rhEPO剂量以维持目标血细胞比容为35%。在研究结束时(6 Mo),尽管基线平均血细胞比容(31.0 +/- 0.9对33.0 +/- 1.0%),相当的平均基线每周Rhepo剂量(7886 +/- 1449与6370 +/- 1553 U / WK),平均Tsat的显着较低(11.3 +/- 3.5与30.1 +/- 3.5%; P <0.05),与口腔组相比的ITDI组显着高于平均血细胞比容(36.0 +/- 1.0与31.4 +/- 1.1%; P <0.05)和TSAT(33.7 +/- 3.7与22.6 +/- 4.0%; P <0.05)值。此外,ITDI组的最终平均剂量为每周rhepo(4799 +/- 981对9998 +/- 1027 U / WK; P <0.05)。 ITDI组中没有患者对静脉注射铁产生不良反应。得出结论,ITDI代表了接受Rhepo的PD患者的一种更有效的铁补充方法。此外,ITDI是安全且耐受性良好的,并且可以在门诊设定中施用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号