...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology >Comparison of Outcome Measures for Traditional and Online Support Groups for Breast Cancer Patients: An Integrative Literature Review
【24h】

Comparison of Outcome Measures for Traditional and Online Support Groups for Breast Cancer Patients: An Integrative Literature Review

机译:乳腺癌患者传统和网上支持群的结果措施的比较:一篇综合文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite widespread use of support groups in the breast cancer patient population, there are heterogeneous outcome measurements and inconsistencies in their perceived benefits. The purpose of this integrative literature review is to compare the efficacies of traditional and online support groups for breast cancer survivors through analysis of outcome measurements and determination of strengths and weaknesses. After examining the literature, it was found that online support groups are ideal for women who require additional support or who are unable to attend a traditional group. Alternatively, traditional support groups allow for discussion and support tailored to specific cultures and are especially beneficial when a breast cancer survivor is included in the process. These findings suggest that because both traditional and online support groups have unique roles in the psychosocial support of female breast cancer survivors, individual preferences and needs should be considered when determining which support groups will be beneficial.
机译:尽管在乳腺癌患者人口中广泛使用了支持群,但在他们的感知益处中存在异质结果测量和不一致。这种综合文献综述的目的是通过分析结果测量和强度和劣势的测定来比较传统和在线支持群体对乳腺癌幸存者的疗效。在审查文献后,发现在线支持群体是需要额外支持或无法参加传统集团的妇女的理想选择。或者,传统的支持基团允许对特定培养物量身定制的讨论和支持,并且当在该过程中包含乳腺癌幸存者时特别有益。这些调查结果表明,由于传统和在线支持群体都有在女性乳腺癌的心理社会支持中具有独特的作用,因此在确定哪些支持群体是有益的时,应考虑个人偏好和需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号