首页> 外文期刊>Journal of substance abuse treatment >Comparison of 12-step groups to mutual help alternatives for AUD in a large, national study: Differences in membership characteristics and group participation, cohesion, and satisfaction
【24h】

Comparison of 12-step groups to mutual help alternatives for AUD in a large, national study: Differences in membership characteristics and group participation, cohesion, and satisfaction

机译:将12步群与互联网互联网互联替代品的比较:会员特征和团体参与,凝聚力和满足的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Many studies suggest that participation in 12-step groups contributes to better recovery outcomes, but people often object to such groups and most do not sustain regular involvement. Yet, research on alternatives to 12-step groups is very sparse. The present study aimed to extend the knowledge base on mutual help group alternatives for those with an alcohol use disorder (AUD), sampling from large, active, abstinence-focused groups including Women for Sobriety (WFS), LifeRing, and SMART Recovery (SMART). This paper presents a cross-sectional analysis of this longitudinal study, using baseline data to describe the profile and participation characteristics of attendees of these groups in comparison to 12-step members.
机译:背景:许多研究表明,参与12步群体有助于更好的恢复结果,但人们往往反对这些群体,并且大多数人不经常受到普遍参与。 然而,对12步组的替代方案的研究非常稀疏。 本研究旨在将知识库扩展到互助群体的替代品,为酒精使用障碍(AUD),从大型,活性,禁止的群体中的抽样,包括妇女的患者(WFS),提升和智能恢复(智能 )。 本文介绍了该纵向研究的横截面分析,使用基线数据来描述与12步成员相比,描述这些群体的与会者的概况和参与特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号