...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: The official journal of National Stroke Association >Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram for the Treatment of Poststroke Depression: A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Efficacy and Safety of Citalopram for the Treatment of Poststroke Depression: A Meta-Analysis

机译:西替普替普替普替普替普替普替普施用于治疗后抑郁症的疗效和安全性:META分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

ObjectiveTo objectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of citalopram versus other antidepressant drugs in poststroke depression (PSD) treatment. MethodsWe searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared citalopram with other Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs) on PSD treatment. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software with standard mean difference (SMD) or Relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI). ResultsA total of 20 studies involving 1485 patients were included .The RR of efficacy index compared to other SSRIs was 1.04 [95% CI: .98-1.09,P?=?.17], and to SNRIs was 1.01 [95% CI: .93-1.09,P?=?.83]. The RR of cure index compared to other SSRIs was .99 [95% CI: .82-1.19,P?=?.88], and to SNRIs was .95 [95% CI: .71-1.27,P?=?.74]. Significant decreases on Hamilton Depression Scale scores were observed in favor of citalopram when compared to other SSRIs after 4-, 6-week treatment [SMD?=??.44, 95% CI: ?.85 to ?.03,P?=?.03; SMD?=??.50, 95% CI: ?.98 to ?.02,P?=?.04], and no significant difference was found with SNRIs in any week [P> .05]. The rate of adverse effects also showed no significant difference between citalopram and other antidepressants [P> .05]. ConclusionsThis meta-analysis indicates that the efficacy of citalopram is similar to that of other SSRIs and SNRIs, but citalopram takes action faster than other SSRIs. The adverse effects of citalopram have no significant difference compared to other antidepressants and those adverse effects are less and mild.
机译:目的客观评价疗效和西酞普兰与其他抗抑郁药物在卒中后抑郁(PSD)治疗的安全性。 MethodsWe找遍随机对照试验(RCT),其与其它选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)和PSD治疗血清素去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs的)进行比较西酞普兰。随机对照试验的方法学质量是根据偏置工具的科克伦风险评估。 Meta分析是采用RevMan 5.3软件标准平均差(SMD)或相对危险度(RR)和95%的置信区间(CI)进行。相比于其他的SSRIs结果共涉及1485例20个研究被列入疗效指数的.The RR为1.04 [95%CI:.98-1.09,P =?17?],和SNRIs的为1.01 [95%CI: .93-1.09,P?=?83]。相比于其他的SSRIs固化指数的RR为0.99 [95%CI:.82-1.19,P =?88?],和SNRIs的是0.95 [95%CI:.71-1.27,P =? 0.74。 ???显著4-,6周的治疗[SMD = ?? 44,95%CI后相对于其他的SSRIs当关于有利于西酞普兰的观察汉密尔顿抑郁量表的得分下降:0.85至0.03,P = ?0.03; ?SMD = ?? 50,95%CI:???0.98至0.02,P =?04],并没有显著差异被发现时的SNRI在任何周[P> 0.05]。的不利影响的速率也显示西酞普兰和其他抗抑郁药[P> 0.05]之间没有显著差异。 ConclusionsThis荟萃分析表明,西酞普兰的疗效与其他的SSRIs和SNRIs的,但西酞普兰采取行动比其他的SSRIs快。西酞普兰的不利影响没有显著差异相对于其他抗抑郁药和这些不利影响也越来越轻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号