...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >TOTAL AND SEGMENTAL BODY COMPOSITION EXAMINATION IN COLLEGIATE FOOTBALL PLAYERS USING MULTIFREQUENCY BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS AND DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
【24h】

TOTAL AND SEGMENTAL BODY COMPOSITION EXAMINATION IN COLLEGIATE FOOTBALL PLAYERS USING MULTIFREQUENCY BIOELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE ANALYSIS AND DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY

机译:使用多频生物电阻抗分析和双X射线吸收测定的总体和节段身体成分检查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The current study examined the influence of player position on the agreement between multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MfBIA) and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) when assessing total and segmental percent body fat (BF%), fat mass (FM), and fat-free mass (FFM) in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I collegiate football athletes. Forty-four male collegiate athletes (age = 19 +/- 1 year; height = 1.9 +/- 1.0 m; and body mass = 106.4 +/- 18.8 kg) participated. Player positions included: offensive linemen (OL; n = 7), tight ends (TE; n = 4), wide receivers (WR; n = 9), defensive linemen (DL; n = 6), defensive backs (DB; n = 8), linebackers (LB; n = 6), and running backs (RB; n = 4). Total and segmental body composition measured using MfBIA were compared with values obtained using DXA. Compared with DXA, MfBIA underestimated BF% (3.0 +/- 3.8%), total FM (2.5 +/- 4.3 kg), arm FM (0.4 +/- 0.8 kg), arm FFM (1.4 +/- 0.9 kg), leg FM (2.8 +/- 2.0 kg), and leg FFM (5.4 +/- 2.4 kg) (all p 0.001; arm FM p = 0.002) and overestimated total FFM (-2.4 +/- 4.5 kg) (p 0.001). Limits of agreement (LOAs) were: +/- 7.39% (BF%), +/- 8.50 kg (total FM), +/- 1.50 kg (arm FM), +/- 1.83 kg (arm FFM), +/- 3.83 kg (leg FM), +/- 4.62 kg (leg FFM), and +/- 8.83 kg (total FFM). No significant differences were observed between devices for trunk FM (-0.3 +/- 3.0 kg; p = 0.565) and trunk FFM (0.4 +/- 2.4 kg; p = 0.278), with LOAs of +/- 5.92 and +/- 4.69 kg, respectively. Player position significantly affected all between-device mean body composition measurement differences (adjusted p = 0.05), with OL demonstrating the greatest effect on each variable. Therefore, MfBIA does not seem accurate in examining betweenplayer body composition in college football players.
机译:当前研究检测了运动员位置对多频生物电阻抗分析(MFBIA)和双X射线吸收测量(DXA)之间的协议的影响,评估总体脂肪(BF%),脂肪量(FM)和脂肪 - 美国大学竞技协会司I合唱团足球运动员的免群众(FFM)。四十四名男性大学运动员(年龄= 19 +/- 1年;身高= 1.9 +/- 1.0米;身体质量= 106.4 +/- 18.8千克)参加。播放器职位包括:令人反感的线民(OL; n = 7),紧末端(TE; n = 4),宽接收器(WR; n = 9),防御线守(dl; n = 6),防守返回(db; n = 8),线卫(LB; n = 6),并运行返回(RB; n = 4)。将使用MFBIa测量的总体和节段体组成与使用DXA获得的值进行比较。与DXA相比,MFBIA低估BF%(3.0 +/- 3.8%),总FM(2.5 +/- 4.3千克),ARM FM(0.4 +/- 0.8千克),ARM FFM(1.4 +/- 0.9千克),腿FM(2.8 +/- 2.0千克)和腿FFM(5.4 +/- 2.4千克)(所有P <0.001;臂FM P = 0.002),高估总FFM(-2.4 +/- 4.5千克)(P & 0.001)。协议限制(LOAS)是:+/- 7.39%(BF%),+/- 8.50公斤(总FM),+/- 1.50千克(ARM FM),+/- 1.83千克(ARM FFM),+ / - 3.83千克(腿部FM),+/- 4.62千克(腿FFM),+/- 8.83千克(总FFM)。在躯干FM(-0.3 +/- 3.0 kg; p = 0.565)和躯干FFM(0.4 +/- 2.4 kg; p = 0.278)之间没有显着差异,+/- 5.92和+/-分别为4.69千克。播放器位置显着影响所有设备之间的平均组成测量差异(调节的P = 0.05),ol展示了对每个变量的最大影响。因此,MFBIA似乎在大学足球运动员中的播放器身体组成之间似乎并不准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号