...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Comparison of the Effects of Eccentric, Concentric, and Eccentric-Concentric Isotonic Resistance Training at Two Velocities on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy
【24h】

Comparison of the Effects of Eccentric, Concentric, and Eccentric-Concentric Isotonic Resistance Training at Two Velocities on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy

机译:偏心,同心和偏心 - 同时等渗训练对两种速度的影响对强度和肌肉肥大的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

unlu, G, cevikol, C, and Melekoglu, T. Comparison of the effects of eccentric, concentric, and eccentric-concentric isotonic resistance training at two velocities on strength and muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 34(2): 337-344, 2020-The aim of this study was to compare the effects of concentric, eccentric, and eccentric-concentric isotonic resistance training at both fast and slow velocities to determine whether contraction modality affects muscle strength and hypertrophy. Forty-one young, healthy males (mean age 21.1 +/- 1.8 years; height 178.9 +/- 6.1 cm; body mass 70.5 +/- 9.8 kg; and body mass index 22.0 +/- 2.6 kg center dot m(-2)) were randomly assigned for 12 weeks to 1 of 5 resistance training groups to perform leg extension exercises 3 days a week (fast-eccentric; fast-concentric [FC]; slow-eccentric [SE]; slow-concentric; and concentric-eccentric [CE], 30 degrees center dot s(-1) for slow and 180 degrees center dot s(-1) for fast contractions), or to a nontraining control group (CG). Isotonic strength (1 repetition maximum [1RM]), isokinetic strength (peak torque), and quadriceps femoris muscle volume were measured before and after the 12 weeks of training program. In the early phase of the training period (first 3 weeks), the 1RM values of SE, FC, and CE increased remarkably (19.70, 13.73, and 19.35%, respectively; p < 0.05). Significant increases compared with the CG were found for muscle isotonic strength (similar to 25-41%, p < 0.001) and isokinetic peak torque at 60 degrees center dot s(-1) (similar to 13-32%, p < 0.05) in all training groups after the 12 weeks of the training period. No statistically significant interactions between the group and time were found on isokinetic peak torques at 180 degrees center dot s(-1) and muscle volume. Our results, therefore, suggest that all the training modalities in our study have the potential to induce isotonic strength gain in knee extensors, and there is insufficient evidence for the superiority of any specific mode of muscle contraction or velocity.
机译:UNLU,G,Cevikol,C和Melekoglu,T.偏心,同心和偏心 - 同时等渗电阻训练对强度和肌肉肥大的影响的比较。 J Fircience Cond Res 34(2):337-344,2020-本研究的目的是比较快速和慢速速度的同心,偏心和偏心 - 同时等渗性训练的影响,以确定收缩模态是否会影响肌肉力量和肥厚。四十一名年轻,健康的男性(平均21.1 +/- 1.8岁;身高178.9 +/- 6.1厘米;体积70.5 +/- 9.8公斤;体重指数22.0 +/- 2.6千克中心点M(-2 ))被随机分配12周至5个阻力训练组,每周3天进行腿部延伸锻炼(快速偏心;快速同心[Fc];慢偏心[SE];慢同心;和同心 - 偏心[CE],30度中心点S(-1)用于慢速和180度中心点S(-1),用于快速收缩,或者是非训练对照组(CG)。等渗强度(1重复最大[1RM]),等渗强度(峰值扭矩)和Quadriceps股骨肌肉体积在训练计划之前和之后测量。在训练期的早期阶段(前3周),SE,Fc和Ce的1RM值显着(19.70,13.73和19.35%,P <0.05)。与肌肉等渗强度(类似于25-41%,P <0.001)和在60度中心点(-1)的同源峰扭矩(类似于13-32%,P <0.05),发现与CG相比显着增加在培训期后12周后的所有培训组中。在180度中心点S(-1)和肌肉体积,对基团和时间之间没有统计学显着的相互作用。因此,我们的结果表明,我们研究中的所有培训方式都有可能诱导膝关节延伸部的等渗强度增益,并且存在任何特定肌肉收缩或速度模式的优越性的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号