首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >SPECIFIC ADAPTATIONS IN PERFORMANCE AND MUSCLE ARCHITECTURE AFTER WEIGHTED JUMP-SQUAT VS. BODY MASS SQUAT JUMP TRAINING IN RECREATIONAL SOCCER PLAYERS
【24h】

SPECIFIC ADAPTATIONS IN PERFORMANCE AND MUSCLE ARCHITECTURE AFTER WEIGHTED JUMP-SQUAT VS. BODY MASS SQUAT JUMP TRAINING IN RECREATIONAL SOCCER PLAYERS

机译:加权跳闸蹲伏后性能和肌肉架构的具体适应 身体大规模蹲坐休闲足球运动员的跳跃训练

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of weighted jump-squat training (WJST) vs. body mass squat jump training (BMSJT) on quadriceps' muscle architecture, lower-limb lean-mass (LM) and muscle strength, performance in change of direction (COD), and sprint and jump in recreational soccer players. Forty-eight healthy soccer players participated in an offseason randomized controlled trial. Before and after an 8-week training intervention, vastus lateralis pennation angle, fascicle length, muscle thickness, LM, squat 1RM, quadriceps and hamstrings isokinetic peak torque, agility T-test, 10-and 30-m sprints, and squat-jump (SJ) were measured. Although similar increases were observed in muscle thickness, fascicle length increased more in WJST (Effect size [ES] = 1.18, 0.82-1.54) than in BMSJT (ES = 0.54, 0.40-0.68), and pennation angle increased only in BMSJT (ES = 1.03, 0.78-1.29). Greater increases in LM were observed in WJST (ES = 0.44, 0.29-0.59) than in BMSJT (ES = 0.21, 0.07-0.37). The agility T-test (ES = 2.95, 2.72-3.18), 10-m (ES = 0.52, 0.22-0.82), and 30-m sprints (ES = 0.52, 0.230.81) improved only in WJST, whereas SJ improved in BMSJT (ES = 0.89, 0.43-1.35) more than in WJST (ES = 0.30, 0.03-0.58). Similar increases in squat 1RM and peak torque occurred in both groups. The greater inertia accumulated within the landing phase in WJST vs. BMSJT has increased the eccentric workload, leading to specific eccentric-like adaptations in muscle architecture. The selective improvements in COD in WJST may be related to the increased braking ability generated by the enhanced eccentric workload.
机译:本研究的目的是比较加权跳跃训练(WJST)对阵体积蹲伏训练(BMSJT)对Quadriceps的肌肉建筑,低肢瘦肉(LM)和肌肉力量,性能的影响在改变方向(COD),并在休闲足球运动员中跳跃和跳跃。四十八个健康的足球运动员参加了休赛赛道随机对照试验。在8周培训干预之前和之后,夸张的侧面缠绕角度,绒毛孔长度,肌肉厚度,LM,Squat 1RM,QuadRiceps和腿筋等血管峰值扭矩,敏捷T检验,10-00和30米冲刺,并挤出跳跃(SJ)被测量。虽然在肌肉厚度中观察到类似的增加,但在WJST(效果尺寸= 1.18,0.82-1.54)中,比在BMSJT(ES = 0.54,0.40-0.68)中增加了相似的增加(ES = 0.54,0.40-0.68),并且Pennation角度仅在BMSJT中增加(ES = 1.03,0.78-1.29)。在WJST(ES = 0.44,0.29-0.59)中观察到LM的较大增加,而不是BMSJT(ES = 0.21,0.07-0.37)。敏感性T检验(ES = 2.95,2.72-3.18),10-M(ES = 0.52,0.22-0.82)和30米冲刺(ES = 0.52,0.230.81)仅在WJST中得到改善,而SJ改进在BMSJT(ES = 0.89,0.43-1.35)中超过WJST(ES = 0.30,0.03-0.58)。在两个组中发生蹲下1rm和峰值扭矩的类似增加。在WJST与BMSJT的着陆阶段内积累的较大惯性增加了偏心工作量,导致肌肉架构中的特定偏心样适应。 WJST中COD的选择性改进可能与增强的偏心工作量产生的制动能力增加有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号