首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >LOADS AND MOVEMENT SPEEDS DICTATE DIFFERENCES IN POWER OUTPUT DURING CIRCUIT TRAINING
【24h】

LOADS AND MOVEMENT SPEEDS DICTATE DIFFERENCES IN POWER OUTPUT DURING CIRCUIT TRAINING

机译:负载和移动速度决定电路训练期间功率输出的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Roberson, KB, Chowdhari, SS, White, MJ, and Signorile, JF. Loads and movement speeds dictate differences in power output during circuit training. J Strength Cond Res 31(10): 2765-2776, 2017-Power training has become a common exercise intervention for improving muscle strength, power, and physical function while reducing injury risk. Few studies, however, have evaluated acute load changes on power output during traditional resistance training protocols. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the effects of different loading patterns on power output during a single session of circuit resistance training (CRT). Nine male (age = 19.4 +/- 0.9 years) and 11 female participants (age = 20.6 +/- 1.6 years) completed 3 CRT protocols during separate testing sessions using 7 pneumatic exercises. Protocols included heavy load explosive contraction (HLEC: 80% one repetition maximum [1RM], maximum speed concentric-2 seconds eccentric), heavy load controlled contraction (HLCC: 80% 1RM, 2 seconds concentric-2 seconds eccentric), and moderate load explosive contraction (MLEC: 50% 1RM, maximum speed concentric-2 seconds eccentric). Protocols were assigned randomly using a counterbalanced design. Power for each repetition and set were determined using computerized software interfaced with each machine. Blood lactate was measured at rest and immediately postexercise. For male and female participants, average power was significantly greater during all exercises for HLEC and MLEC than HLCC. Average power was greatest during the HLEC for leg press (LP), hip adduction (ADD), and hip abduction (ABD) (p <= 0.05), whereas male participants alone produced their greatest power during HLEC for leg curl (LC) (p < 0.001). For male and female participants, significantly greater power was detected by set for LP, lat pull-down (LAT), ADD, LC, and ABD for the MLEC protocol (p < 0.02) and for LP, LAT, CP, and LC for the HLEC protocol (p < 0.03). A condition 3 sex interaction was seen for blood lactate changes (eta(2)(p) = 0.249; p = 0.024), with female participants producing a significantly greater change for MLEC than HLEC (M-diff = 1.61 +/- 0.35 mmol.L-1; p = 0.011), whereas male participants showed no significant differences among conditions. Performing a CRT protocol using explosive training patterns, especially at high loads for lower-body exercises and moderate loads for upper-body exercises, produces significantly higher power than controlled speed training in most exercises. These results provide exercisers, personal trainers, and strength coaches with information that can assist in the design of training protocols to maximize power output during CRT.
机译:罗伯森,KB,Chowdhari,SS,White,MJ和Signorile,JF。负载和移动速度决定电路训练期间电源输出的差异。 J Fircience Cond Res 31(10):2017-2776,2017-功率训练已成为改善肌肉力量,功率和物理功能的常见运动干预,同时降低伤害风险。然而,很少有研究已经评估了传统电阻训练协议期间功率输出的急性负荷变化。因此,本研究的目的是在电路电阻训练(CRT)的单一会话期间量化不同装载模式对电力输出的影响。九个男性(年龄= 19.4 +/- 0.9岁)和11名女性参与者(年龄= 20.6 +/- 1.6岁)在使用7个气动练习的单独测试会话期间完成了3个CRT协议。协议包括重载爆炸性收缩(HLEC:80%一次重复[1RM],最大速度同心-2秒偏心),重负荷控制收缩(HLCC:80%1rm,2秒同心-2秒偏心),和适度的负荷爆炸性收缩(MLEC:50%1RM,最大速度同心-2秒偏心)。协议使用平衡设计随机分配。使用与每台机器接口的计算机化软件确定每次重复和集合的电源。在休息时测量血液乳酸,并立即进行分娩。对于男性和女性参与者,在HLEC和MLEC的所有练习中,平均力量明显更大,而不是HLCC。在腿部压力机(LP)的HLEC中,平均功率最大,髋关节收缩(添加)和髋关节绑架(ABD)(P <= 0.05),而男性参与者在HLEC中为腿卷曲(LC)产生最大的电力(LC)( P <0.001)。对于男性和女性参与者,通过为MLEC协议(P <0.02)和LP,LAT,CP和LC为LP,LAT下拉(LAT),ADD,LC和ABD来检测到明显更大的功率。 HLEC协议(P <0.03)。对于血液乳酸改变(ETA(2)(p)= 0.249; p = 0.024),女性参与者比HLEC产生显着更大的更大变化(M-DIFF = 1.61 +/- 0.35mmol .L-1; P = 0.011),而男性参与者在条件下没有显着差异。使用爆炸性训练模式进行CRT协议,特别是在高负荷下进行低负荷,对大多数练习产生比控制速度训练显着更高的功率。这些结果提供了可以帮助设计培训协议以最大化CRT的电力输出的信息提供锻炼者,私人教练和力量教练。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号