...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Physical Response to Pad- and Bag-Based Boxing-Specific Training Modalities
【24h】

Physical Response to Pad- and Bag-Based Boxing-Specific Training Modalities

机译:对垫和基于袋的拳击特定培训方式的物理响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Finlay, MJ, Greig, M, McCarthy, J, and Page, RM. Physical response to pad- and bag-based boxing-specific training modalities. J Strength Cond Res 34(4): 1052-1061, 2020-This study examined the differences in the physical response elicited from a contemporary Boxing-Specific Exercise Protocol (BSEP) performed using a punch bag and a pad routine. Fourteen male elite amateur boxers (age = 22 +/- 2 years; height = 176.9 +/- 7.3 cm; body mass = 78.8 +/- 8.7 kg; and V?o(2)max = 55.94 +/- 5.96 ml center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1)) were recruited. The BSEP comprised 3 x 3-minute rounds. Average (HRave) and peak (HRpeak) heart rate, average (V?o(2)ave) and peak oxygen consumption (V?o(2)peak), blood lactate (BLa) concentrations, rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and both triaxial and uniaxial PlayerLoad metrics were recorded during each trial. The PlayerLoad metrics were recorded at both the cervical and lumbar spine. BLa increased significantly across rounds, with higher values recorded in the pad trial (pad = 2.7 +/- 0.8 mmol center dot L-1; bag = 2.3 +/- 0.9 mmol center dot L-1). A similar response was also identified for the HRave (pad = 160 +/- 9 b center dot min(-1); bag = 150 +/- 16 b center dot min(-1)) and V?o(2)ave data (pad = 38.00 +/- 0.31 ml center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1); bag = 34.40 +/- 1.06 ml center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1)). A significant main effect for time was also recorded for the RPE data; however, there were no significant differences between trials. Conversely, the triaxial (PLTotal) and medial-lateral (PLML) data were higher in the punch bag trial. There was also a main effect for time for all the PlayerLoad metrics. PLTotal, PLML, and vertical PlayerLoad were significantly higher in the lumbar region when compared with the cervical region. With implications for boxing-specific conditioning, the pad routine was more physiologically demanding, but less mechanically demanding than the bag routine.
机译:Finlay,MJ,Greig,M,McCarthy,J和Page,RM。对基于垫和基于袋的拳击特定培训方式的物理响应。 J强度COND RES 34(4):1052-1061,2020-本研究检测了使用冲头袋和焊盘常规进行的当代拳击特定运动方案(BSEP)引发的物理反应的差异。十四名男性精英业余拳击手(年龄= 22 +/- 2年;高度= 176.9 +/- 7.3厘米;体重= 78.8 +/- 8.7千克;和v?o(2)max = 55.94 +/- 5.96 ml中心招募点kg(-1)中心点min(-1))。 BSEP包含3×3分钟的圆形。平均(河岸)和峰(HRPeak)心率,平均(V≤O(2)AVE)和峰值氧消耗(V?O(2)峰),血液乳酸(BLA)浓度,感知劳动的额定(RPE)并且在每次试验期间都会记录三轴和单轴玩具载量标。玩家载荷度量在颈椎和腰椎上记录。 BLA跨越圆形大幅增加,焊盘试验中记录了较高的值(PAD = 2.7 +/- 0.8 mmol中心点L-1; BAG = 2.3 +/- 0.9 mmol中心点L-1)。还识别出类似的返回(PAD = 160 +/- 9 b中心点MIN(-1);袋= 150 +/- 16 b中心点MIN(-1))和V?O(2)AVE数据(PAD = 38.00 +/- 0.31 mL中心点kg(-1)中心点Min(-1);袋= 34.40 +/- 1.06 mL中心点kg(-1)中心点Min(-1))。对于RPE数据,还记录了时间的显着的主要效果;但是,试验之间没有显着差异。相反,打孔袋试验中的三轴(Pltotal)和内侧横向(PLML)数据较高。所有玩家载荷度量的时间也有主要效果。与宫颈区域相比,腰部区域的PLTOTAL,PLML和垂直玩家显着高得多。对于针对拳击特定调理的影响,垫常规更高,但比袋式常规更低的机械要求苛刻。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号