首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sex research >A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources
【24h】

A Methodological Review of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Sexuality Research: Used Practices, Best Practices, and Data Analysis Resources

机译:性能研究探索性因子分析的方法综述:使用的实践,最佳实践和数据分析资源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sexuality researchers frequently use exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to illuminate the distinguishable theoretical constructs assessed by a set of variables. EFA entails a substantive number of analytic decisions to be made with respect to sample size determination, and how factors are extracted, rotated, and retained. The available analytic options, however, are not all equally empirically rigorous. We discuss the commonly available options for conducting EFA and which options constitute best practices for EFA. We also present the results of a methodological review of the analytic options for EFA used by sexuality researchers in more than 200 EFAs, published in more than 160 articles and chapters from 1974 to 2014, in a sample of sexuality research journals. Our review reveals that best practices for EFA are actually those least frequently used by sexuality researchers. We introduce freely available analytic resources to help make it easier for sexuality researchers to adhere to best practices when conducting EFAs in their own research.
机译:性研究人员经常使用探索性因子分析(EFA)来照亮由一组变量评估的可区分理论构建体。 EFA需要关于样本尺寸测定的实质性分析决定,以及如何提取,旋转和保留因子。然而,可用的分析选项并非所有同等凭经质严谨。我们讨论了开展EFA的常用选项以及哪些备选方案构成了EFA的最佳实践。我们还介绍了200多个EFA的性行为研究人员在20074年至2014年出版的200多章和章节中发表的关于2007年至2014年的2章,在性行为研究期刊上发表的方法论审查的方法。我们的评论显示,EFA的最佳实践实际上是性行为研究人员最不频繁使用的。我们介绍自由的分析资源,以帮助使性行为研究人员更容易,以便在自己的研究中进行EFA时遵守最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号