首页> 外文期刊>Journal of radiological protection: Official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection >Past and present work practices of European interventional cardiologists in the context of radiation protection of the eye lens-results of the EURALOC study
【24h】

Past and present work practices of European interventional cardiologists in the context of radiation protection of the eye lens-results of the EURALOC study

机译:欧洲介入心脏病学家在辐射保护背景下的过去和现状的工作实践 - EULECOC研究的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper investigates over five decades of work practices in interventional cardiology, with an emphasis on radiation protection. The analysis is based on data from more than 400 cardiologists from various European countries recruited for a EURALOC study and collected in the period from 2014 to 2016. Information on the types of procedures performed and their annual mean number, fluoroscopy time, access site choice, x-ray units and radiation protection means used was collected using an occupational questionnaire. Based on the specific European data, changes in each parameter have been analysed over decades, while country-specific data analysis has allowed us to determine the differences in local practices. In particular, based on the collected data, the typical workload of a European cardiologist working in a haemodynamic room and an electrophysiology room was specified for various types of procedures. The results showed that when working in a haemodynamic room, a transparent ceiling-suspended lead shield or lead glasses are necessary in order to remain below the recommended eye lens dose limit of 20 mSv. Moreover, the analysis revealed that new, more complex cardiac procedures such as chronic total occlusion, valvuloplasty and pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation ablation might contribute substantially to annual doses, although they are relatively rarely performed. The results revealed that considerable progress has been made in the use of radiation protection tools. While their use in electrophysiology procedures is not generic, the situation in haemodynamic procedures is rather encouraging, as ceiling-suspended shields are used in 90% of cases, while the combination of ceiling shield and lead glasses is noted in more than 40% of the procedures. However, we find that still 7% of haemodynamic procedures are performed without any radiation protection tools.
机译:本文调查了介入心脏病学中的五十年工作实践,重点是辐射保护。该分析基于来自来自各种欧洲各国的400多名心脏病学家的数据,招募了Eulloc研究并在2014年至2016年期间收集。关于所履行的程序类型及其年均数量,透视时间,接入站点选择的信息,使用职业调查问卷收集使用的X射线单元和辐射保护装置。基于特定的欧洲数据,几十年来分析了每个参数的变化,而国家特定的数据分析使我们能够确定当地实践中的差异。特别是基于所收集的数据,为各种类型的程序指定了在血管动力学室和电生理学室中工作的欧洲心脏病专家的典型工作量。结果表明,当在血管动力学室工作时,需要透明的吊顶悬挂式引线屏蔽或铅眼镜,以便保持低于20msv的推荐的眼睛镜片剂量限制。此外,分析表明,新的,更复杂的心脏手术如慢性总闭塞,valvulopactAby和心房颤动消融的肺静脉分离可能会对年剂量大致贡献,尽管它们相对较少进行。结果表明,在使用辐射防护工具方面取得了相当大的进展。虽然他们在电生理学程序中使用不通用,但血液动力学程序中的情况相当令人鼓舞,因为在90%的情况下使用了天花板悬挂屏蔽,而吊屏蔽和铅眼镜的组合则以超过40%的人指出程序。但是,我们发现仍然是7%的血液动力学程序在没有任何辐射保护工具的情况下进行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号