首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >An Integrated, Developmental Four-Year Medical School Curriculum in Palliative Care: A Longitudinal Content Evaluation Based on National Competency Standards
【24h】

An Integrated, Developmental Four-Year Medical School Curriculum in Palliative Care: A Longitudinal Content Evaluation Based on National Competency Standards

机译:姑息治疗中综合发展四年医学学校课程:基于国家能力标准的纵向内容评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: While palliative care (PC) competencies for medical school graduates have been defined, the lack of established curriculum models and assessment tools hampers curricular evaluation. Objective: To describe the scope and content of the University of Rochester's longitudinal, integrated four-year PC curriculum after 17 years of implementation, review student evaluative responses, and compare the curriculum to national competency standards. Design and Setting: Combining and reorganizing a published PC curriculum assessment tool and a list of medical school PC competencies, we created a novel nine-topic framework to assess the content coverage of our curriculum. We queried our electronic medical school curriculum database and surveyed course and clerkship directors, as well as PC, pain, ethics, and humanities faculty, to locate where and when PC topics are taught and to collate student responses to these experiences. Results: We present a comprehensive list of PC curricular activities over a four-year medical school experience. The curriculum covers all nine PC topics longitudinally in multiple formats. Five in-depth activities cover multiple PC topics in a format that integrates biological, psychological, and social dimensions; these activities have survived and evolved over 17 years in our setting. A majority of year 3 University of Rochester students feel “well” or “extremely well” trained in PC. Conclusions: Our four-year PC curriculum provides robust and developmentally appropriate training that addresses all nine evidence-based core topics for PC education. Medical student feedback and their Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) survey responses suggest that they find their PC learning experiences rewarding. This curriculum could serve as a model for other schools.
机译:背景:虽然已经定义了医学院毕业生的姑息治疗(PC)能力,但缺乏既定的课程模型和评估工具妨碍了课外评估。目的:介绍罗彻斯特大学纵向,综合的四年PC课程的范围和内容,审查学生评估响应,并将课程与国家能力标准进行比较。设计和设置:结合和重组发布的PC课程评估工具和医学学校PC竞争力的列表,我们创建了一个新的九个主题框架,以评估我们课程的内容覆盖范围。我们询问了我们的电子医学学校课程数据库和调查课程和门禁董事,以及PC,痛苦,道德和人文学院,找到教授PC主题并将学生对这些经验的回应进行教学。结果:我们在四年医学院经验中展示了全面的PC课程活动清单。课程以多种格式纵向涵盖所有九个PC主题。五种深入活动以整合生物,心理和社会维度的格式涵盖多个PC主题;这些活动在我们的环境中幸存并进化了17岁。罗切斯特大学3大学学生感到“很好”或“非常好”,受过PC培训。结论:我们的四年PC课程提供了强大,发展的适当培训,解决了PC教育的所有九个证据核心主题。医学学生反馈及其美国医学院协会(AAMC)调查响应表明,他们发现他们的PC学习经历有益。本课程可以作为其他学校的模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号