...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of palliative medicine >A Qualitative Study of Pulmonary and Palliative Care Clinician Perspectives on Early Palliative Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
【24h】

A Qualitative Study of Pulmonary and Palliative Care Clinician Perspectives on Early Palliative Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

机译:对慢性阻塞性肺病早期姑息治疗肺和姑息治疗临床视角的定性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Guidelines recommend that pulmonary clinicians involve palliative care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, integration before advanced stage, that is, early palliative care, is rare. Objective: To explore and compare pulmonary and palliative care clinician perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and potential referral criteria for early palliative care in COPD. Design: Qualitative descriptive formative evaluation study. Setting/Subjects: Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians at a tertiary academic medical center. Measurements: Transcribed interviews were thematically analyzed by specialty to identify within- and across-specialty perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and referral criteria. Results: Twelve clinicians (n = 6 pulmonary, n = 6 palliative care) participated. Clinicians from both specialties agreed that early palliative care could add value to disease-focused COPD care. Perspectives on many barriers and facilitators were shared between specialties along broad educational, clinical, and operational categories. Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians shared concerns about the misconception that palliative care was synonymous to end-of-life care. Pulmonologists were particularly concerned about the potential risks of opioids and benzodiazepines in COPD. Both specialties stressed the need for clearly defined roles, consensus referral criteria, and novel delivery models. Although no single referral criterion was discussed by all, frequent hospitalizations and emotional symptoms were raised by most across disciplines. Multimorbidity and poor prognosis were discussed only by palliative care clinicians, whereas medication adherence was discussed only by pulmonary clinicians. Conclusions: Pulmonary and palliative care clinicians supported early palliative care in COPD. Continued needs include addressing pulmonologists' misconceptions of palliative care, establishing consensus referral criteria, and implementing novel early palliative care models.
机译:背景:准则建议肺临床医生涉及慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)的姑息治疗;然而,在高级阶段之前的整合,即早期姑息治疗,是罕见的。目的:探讨和比较肺动脉和姑息治疗临床医生视角,对COPD早期姑息治疗的障碍,促进者和潜在推荐标准。设计:定性描述性形成性评估研究。设定/主题:高等教育医疗中心的肺和姑息治疗临床医生。测量:通过专业进行专题进行专题进行专门进行录取的访谈,以确定在障碍,促进者和推荐标准上的和专业视角范围内。结果:12名临床医生(n = 6肺,n = 6个姑息护理)参加。两种专业的临床医生同意早期的姑息治疗可以增加疾病专注的COPD护理价值。关于许多障碍和促进者的观点是在广泛的教育,临床和运营类别之间分享特色。肺部和姑息治疗临床医生对姑息治疗对生活结束同义词的误解是令人担忧的。肺部学家特别关切的是阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物在COPD中的风险。两种专业都强调需要明确定义的角色,共识转介标准和新型交付模式。虽然所有人都没有讨论单一推荐标准,但大多数跨学科都会举办频繁的住院治疗和情绪症状。仅通过姑息治疗临床医生讨论多元化和不良预后,而仅通过肺临床医生讨论药物依从性。结论:肺和姑息治疗临床医生在COPD中支持早期姑息治疗。持续需求包括解决肺部学家对姑息治疗的误解,建立共识转介标准,并实施新的早期姑息治疗模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号