首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Researching agricultural environmental behaviour: Improving the reliability of self-reporting
【24h】

Researching agricultural environmental behaviour: Improving the reliability of self-reporting

机译:研究农业环境行为:提高自我报告可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Agricultural practices cause many of the environmental problems in river basins. Changing farmer behaviour to adopt more sustainable practices is a key focus of government policy in many countries. There is now a need to assess the effectiveness of projects that promote environmental agricultural behaviour. Most agricultural research that evaluates landholder practices relies on farmers to report about their own behaviour. This behavioural measure, known as 'self-reporting', has been widely critiqued because reporting is often biased. Little is known about the reliability of self-reports about environmental behaviour, and even less is known about self-reporting agricultural environmental behaviour. This paper considers the extent that agricultural environmental research relies on self-reported data, presents a case-study comparing farmer self-reports with more reliable observed proxy data, and offers some methods for minimising self-reporting bias, particularly bias related to participant perceptions of social desirability. We compared self-reports about farmer environmental behaviour (preventing cattle from grazing riverbanks) with observed proxy data (e.g., visual evidence of cattle access) and found that more than 60% of self-reports were inaccurate, including both under- and over-reporting of grazing behaviour. We found that self-reporting is less reliable for identifying behavioural determinants compared to using observed proxy data. We also found that farmers experience social pressure to perform environmental behaviours. Thus, we suggest the inaccuracy of self-reported data may be the result of social desirability bias. Substantial investment has been made to assess the effectiveness of government policy for encouraging agricultural environmental behaviour. The success of such programs relies on the accuracy of behavioural data. Agricultural research often depends on self-reported data. Thus, researchers should make efforts to design projects to reduce the likelihood of self-reporting bias.
机译:农业实践导致河流盆地的许多环境问题。改变农民行为采取更可持续的做法是许多国家政府政策的重点。现在需要评估促进环境农业行为的项目的有效性。大多数评估土地居民做法的农业研究依赖于农民报告自己的行为。这种被称为“自我报告”的行为措施已被广泛批评,因为报告往往偏见。关于环境行为的自我报告的可靠性,甚至少了解自我报告的农业环境行为的知识。本文考虑了农业环境研究依赖于自我报告的数据,提出了一个案例研究,比较农民自我报告,以更可靠的观察代理数据,提供一些方法,以最大限度地减少自我报告偏见,特别是与参与者感知相关的偏差社会宜人。我们将关于农民环境行为的自我报告(防止牛群从河岸)进行了比较,观察到的代理数据(例如,牛进入的视觉证据),发现超过60%的自我报告是不准确的,包括底层和过度报告放牧行为。我们发现,与使用观察到的代理数据相比,自我报告对识别行为决定簇不太可靠。我们还发现农民体验社会压力以执行环境行为。因此,我们建议自我报告的数据的不准确性可能是社会渴望偏见的结果。已经进行了大量投资来评估政府政策令人鼓舞的农业环境行为的有效性。此类计划的成功依赖于行为数据的准确性。农业研究往往取决于自我报告的数据。因此,研究人员应该努力设计项目以减少自我报告偏见的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号