...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Health >Attitudes of family physicians in Washington State toward physician-assisted suicide
【24h】

Attitudes of family physicians in Washington State toward physician-assisted suicide

机译:华盛顿州家庭医师对医生辅助自杀的态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context: The topic of physician-assisted suicide is difficult and controversial. With recent laws allowing physicians to assist in a terminally ill patient's suicide under certain circumstances, the debate concerning the appropriate and ethical rolefor physicians has intensified. Purpose: This paper utilizes data from a 1997 survey of family physicians (FPs) in Washington State to test two hypotheses: (1) older respondents will indicate greater opposition to physician-assisted suicide than their younger colleagues, and (2) male and rural physicians will have more negative attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide than their female and urban counterparts. Methods: A questionnaire administered to all active FPs obtained a 68 percent response rate, with 1074 respondents found to be eligible in this study. A ZIP code system based on generalist Health Service Areas was used to designate those practicing in rural versus urban areas. Findings: One-fourth of the respondents overall indicated support for physician-assisted suicide. When asked whether this practice should be legalized, 39 percent said yes, 44 percent said no, and 18 percent indicated that they did not know. Fifty-eight percent of the study sample reported that they would not include physician-assisted suicide in their practices even if it were legal. Responses disaggregated by age-groups closely paralleled the group overall. There was a significant pattern of opposition on the part of rural male respondents compared to urban female respondents. Even among those reporting support for physician-assisted suicide, many expressed reluctance about including it in their practices. Conclusions: These findings highlight the systematic differences in FP attitudes toward one aspect of health care by gender, rural-urban practice location, and other factors.
机译:背景:医师辅助自杀主题是困难和争议的。随着最近的法律,允许医生在某些情况下协助终年病人的自杀,有关适当和道德的罗勒弗师医生的辩论愈演愈烈。目的:本文利用1997年在华盛顿州的家庭医生(FPS)调查调查中的数据来测试两个假设:(1)较旧的受访者将表明对医生辅助自杀的更大反对,而不是年轻的同事,(2)男性和农村医生将对医生辅助自杀的医生态度比女性和城市同行更多。方法:向所有活性FPS进行调查问卷,获得了68%的响应率,其中有1074名受访者在本研究中有资格。基于通用卫生服务领域的邮政编码系统用于指定农村与城市地区的那些练习。调查结果:受访者的四分之一,总体表明对医师辅助自杀的支持。当被问及这种做法是否应该合法化,39%的人表示是,44%表示不,18%表示他们不知道。五十八百%的研究样本报告说,即使是合法的,他们将不包括医生辅助自杀。由年龄组分解的反应总体的小组密切平行。与城市女性受访者相比,农村男性受访者的一部分有重大的反对模式。甚至在对医生辅助自杀的那些报告支持中,许多人都表示不愿意在其实践中包括它。结论:这些发现突出了性别,农村城市实践地点和其他因素对医疗保健的一个方面的FP态度的系统差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号