首页> 外文期刊>American journal of dentistry >Comparing different enamel pretreatment options for resin-infiltration of natural non-cavitated carious lesions
【24h】

Comparing different enamel pretreatment options for resin-infiltration of natural non-cavitated carious lesions

机译:比较用于天然非空洞性龋损树脂浸润的不同搪瓷预处理选项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To compare two different enamel pretreatments and their effect on the efficiency of penetration of a one-component adhesive into natural carious lesions. Methods: Eight extracted human molars and premolars with non-cavitated interproximal lesions were selected. ICDAS code 1-2 was assessed by visual, microscopic, X-ray and Diagnocam record analysis. Samples were cut vertically across the demineralization to obtain two symmetrical lesions, (n=16). After isolating the cut surfaces with nail varnish, paired lesion halves' surfaces were pretreated with two different techniques: Group 1: surfaces were firstly abraded with fine diamond-coated metallic strips (Steelcarbo) and then etched with 37% H3PO4 acid (Omni-etch, 120 seconds); Group 2: lesion surfaces were etched with 15% HCl acid (Icon-etch, 120 seconds). All teeth were stained with rhodamine isothiocyanate (RITC) solution (12 hours) and subsequently stored in dry chamber (3 hours). All samples were penetrated with a one-component adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) for 180 seconds and coated with a thin layer of flowable composite (Tetric Flow). After light curing, unencapsulated dye was bleached by immersion in 30% hydogen peroxide for 12 hours at 37 degrees C. Remaining lesion pores were stained with sodium fluorescein solution. Thin cuts of the teeth were observed with confocal microscopy and computer image analysis was performed (ImageJ). The percentage of penetration (area of resin penetration/area of total demineralization x100) was calculated. Results: Pretreatment with fine aluminum oxide-coated metallic strip followed by 37% H3PO4 acid showed a larger infiltration area (51.7% +/- 12.2) in almost all samples compared to pretreatment with 15% HCl acid alone (22.1% +/- 13.2). Statistical analysis using t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.011).
机译:为了比较两种不同的牙釉质预处理及其对单组分胶粘剂穿透天然龋齿的效率的影响。方法:选择八颗拔牙的人臼齿和前臼齿,它们之间无空洞。通过视觉,显微镜,X射线和Diagnocam记录分析评估了ICDAS代码1-2。在脱盐过程中垂直切割样品,以获得两个对称的病灶(n = 16)。用指甲隔离切割表面后,用两种不同的技术对成对的病变半部分进行预处理:第一组:首先用细金刚石涂层的金属条(Steelcarbo)打磨表面,然后用37%的H3PO4酸蚀刻(Omni-etch) ,120秒);第2组:用15%HCl酸蚀刻病变表面(Icon蚀刻,120秒)。所有牙齿均用罗丹明异硫氰酸盐(RITC)溶液染色(12小时),然后保存在干燥室中(3小时)。所有样品均用单组分粘合剂(Scotchbond Universal)渗透180秒,并涂上一层薄薄的可流动复合材料(Tetric Flow)。光固化后,将未封装的染料通过在37°C下浸入30%过氧化氢中12小时进行漂白。剩余的病变孔用荧光素钠溶液染色。用共聚焦显微镜观察牙齿的细切,并进行计算机图像分析(ImageJ)。计算渗透百分率(树脂渗透面积/总脱盐面积×100)。结果:与仅使用15%HCl酸进行预处理(22.1%+/- 13.2)相比,使用细氧化铝涂层的金属条进行预处理,然后用37%H3PO4酸进行预处理的结果显示,几乎所有样品中的浸润面积均较大(51.7%+/- 12.2)。 )。使用t检验的统计分析显示两组之间存在显着差异(P = 0.011)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号