首页> 外文期刊>Journal of rehabilitation medicine : >Treatment of upper extremity spasticity in stroke patients by focal neuronal or neuromuscular blockade: a systematic review of the literature.
【24h】

Treatment of upper extremity spasticity in stroke patients by focal neuronal or neuromuscular blockade: a systematic review of the literature.

机译:局灶性神经元或神经肌梗阻治疗中风患者的上肢痉挛:对文献的系统综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Studies published from January 1966 until October 2000 on the clinical effects of focal neuronal and neuromuscular blockade in post stroke upper limb spasticity were identified. Twelve studies were included and evaluated on 13 methodological criteria. Ten studies on Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) treatment were found (of which 4 were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 6 were uncontrolled observational studies) as well as one uncontrolled observational study on phenol blockade of the subscapular muscle and one on alcohol blockade of the musculocutaneus nerve. The homogeneity of the patient groups with regard to diagnosis and their comparability with regard to functional prognosis and other sources of bias were generally unsatisfactory. Only two RCTs met predetermined criteria of minimal validity. There is evidence of effectiveness of BTX-A treatment on reducing muscle tone (varying between 0.8 and 2.0 points on the modified Ashworth scale) and improving passive range of motion at all arm-hand levels in chronic stroke patients for approximately 3-4 months. There is also preliminary evidence of a synergistic effect of concomitant electrostimulation. Taking into account a critical maximum dose of 100 MU Botox" (300-500 MU Dysport) for preserving active finger flexion, BTX-A treatment seems to be a safe focal spasmolytic treatment. Effectiveness of BTX-A treatment on improving functional abilities could not be convincingly demonstrated, although two subgroups may be identified that might specifically benefit at a functional level: (1) patients with mild spasticity and a potential for voluntary extensor activity and (2) patients with severe spasticity suffering from problems with positioning and taking care of the affected arm and hand. Larger controlled studies are needed to compare the effectiveness of BTX-A with other focal spasmolytic techniques paying special attention to individual goal assessment, the (duration of) functional benefits, co-treatment and aftercare, side-effects and cost-effectiveness.
机译:从1966年1月出版的研究直到2000年10月,鉴定了局灶性神经元和神经肌肉阻滞的临床效果。包括12项研究并在13种方法标准中进行评估。发现了对肉毒杆菌毒素型(BTX-A)处理的十项研究(其中4种是随机对照试验(RCT)和6个是不受控制的观察性研究)以及对亚旁肌肉的苯酚封闭的一个不受控制的观察研究酒精阻滞的肌肉软旋神经。关于诊断的患者团体的均匀性及其关于功能预后和其他偏差来源的可比性通常不令人满意。只有两个RCT符合预定的最小有效性标准。有证据表明BTX-A治疗减少肌肉的治疗(在改良的Ashworth规模上的0.8和2.0点之间),并改善慢性中风患者所有手臂水平的被动运动范围约3-4个月。还存在伴随电刺激的协同效应的初步证据。考虑到100 mu Botox的临界最大剂量“(300-500 mu Dysport),用于保留有源手指屈曲,BTX-A治疗似乎是一种安全的局灶性痉挛性治疗。BTX-A对改善功能能力的有效性不能尽管可以识别出令人信服的证据,但是可以鉴定出可能在功能水平特异性受益的两种亚组:(1)痉挛性轻微患者和自愿延伸活动的潜力和(2)患有定位问题的严重痉挛患者的患者受影响的胳膊和手。需要更大的受控研究来比较BTX-A与其他局灶性痉挛技术的有效性,特别注意各个目标评估,(持续时间)功能效益,共同治疗和追踪,副作用和副作用成本效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号