首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment >Assessing Alexithymia: Psychometric Properties and Factorial Invariance of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Nonclinical and Psychiatric Samples
【24h】

Assessing Alexithymia: Psychometric Properties and Factorial Invariance of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in Nonclinical and Psychiatric Samples

机译:评估亚伦思西亚:20项多伦多的心灵性质和阶乘不变性,在非临床和精神病样品中的20项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the three components of alexithymia; difficulty identifying feelings in the self (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally orientated thinking (EOT). We examined the scale's psychometric properties in Australian nonclinical (N = 428) and psychiatric (N = 156) samples. In terms of factorial validity, confirmatory factor analyses found the traditional 3-factor correlated model (DIF, DDF, EOT) to be the best and most parsimonious solution, but it did not reach adequate levels of goodness-of-fit in either sample. Several EOT items loaded poorly on their intended factor, and a reverse-scored item method factor was present; the factor structure of the scale was invariant across both samples. A higher-order factor model (with a single higher-order factor) was slightly inferior to the correlated models, but still tenable. The total scale score and DIF and DDF subscales displayed sound internal consistency, but the EOT subscale did not. We conclude that the TAS-20 has, for the most part, adequate psychometric properties, though interpretation should focus only on the total scale score and DIF and DDF subscales; we recommend the EOT subscale score not be used. Implications for clinical use and future revision of the scale are discussed.
机译:20-Item多伦多Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20)是一个自我报告的问卷,旨在测量alexithymia的三种组分;难以识别自我(DIF)中的感受,描述感受(DDF)和外部定向思维(EOT)。我们在澳大利亚非临床(n = 428)和精神病(n = 156)样品中检查了规模的心理测量性质。在阶乘有效性方面,确认因素分析发现传统的3因素相关模型(DIF,DDF,EOT)是最好和最具典范的解决方案,但它没有达到任何样品的适合良好的良好水平。在其预期因子上装载几个EOT项目,并存在反向得分的项目方法因子;尺度的因子结构在两个样本中都不变。高阶系数模型(具有单个高阶因子)略不如相关模型,但仍然是可行的。总比分和DIF和DDF分量显示的声音内部一致性,但EOT子电路没有。我们得出结论,TAS-20在大多数情况下,足够的心理测量属性,但解释应该只关注总比分和DIF和DDF分量;我们建议未使用EOT子电路分数。讨论了对临床使用和未来修订规模的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号