首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psychopathology and behavioral assessment >Comparing Signal-Contingent and Event-Contingent Experience Sampling Ratings of Affect in a Sample of Psychotherapy Outpatients
【24h】

Comparing Signal-Contingent and Event-Contingent Experience Sampling Ratings of Affect in a Sample of Psychotherapy Outpatients

机译:比较信号 - 偶然和事件偶然的经验对心理治疗门诊样本的影响评级

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experience sampling methods are widely used in clinical psychology to study affective dynamics in psychopathology. The present study examined whether affect ratings (valence and arousal) differed as a function of assessment schedule (signal- versus event-contingent) in a clinical sample and considered various approaches to modeling these ratings. A total of 40 community mental health center outpatients completed ratings of their affective experiences over a 21-day period using both signal-contingent schedules (random prompts) and event-contingent schedules (ratings following social interactions). We tested whether assessment schedules impacted 1) the central tendency (mean) and variability (standard deviation) of valence or arousal considered individually, 2) the joint variability in valence and arousal via the entropy metric, and 3) the between-person differences in configuration of valence-arousal landscapes via the Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) metric. We found that event-contingent schedules, relative to signal-contingent schedules, captured higher average levels of pleasant valence and emotional arousal ratings. Moreover, signal-contingent schedules captured greater variability within and between individuals on arousal-valence landscapes compared to event-contingent schedules. Altogether, findings suggest that the two assessment schedules should not be treated interchangeably in the assessment of affect over time. Researchers must be cautious in generalizing results across studies utilizing different experience sampling assessment schedules.
机译:体验采样方法广泛应用于临床心理学,以研究精神病理学中的情感动态。本研究检查了临床样本中的评估时间表(信号与事件偶然)的函数不同的影响吗?在临床样本中的函数,并考虑了用于建模这些评级的各种方法。共有40名社区心理健康中心门诊患者在使用信号 - 偶然的时间表(随机提示)和事件偶然的时间表(社交互动之后的评级)的情况下,在21天的时间内完成了他们的情感经验评级。我们测试了评估时间表是否受到影响1)的中央趋势(平均值)和可变形(平均值)和变异性(平均值),价值或令人讨论的可变异,2)通过熵度量的价和唤醒的联合变异,以及3)人之间的差异通过地球移动器的距离(EMD)度量计算价谐振景观。我们发现,相对于信号偶然的时间表,捕获的令人愉快的价值和情绪唤起评级的平均水平更高的平均水平。此外,与事件偶然的时间表相比,信号 - 偶数调度捕获了唤醒景观上的个体内部的更大变化。总而言之,调查结果表明,两种评估时间表不应在评估影响时间内可互换地治疗。研究人员必须谨慎地展示各种研究的结果,利用不同的体验抽样评估计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号